The end of Cold War and followed by the collapse of Soviet Union have
transformed the geo-politics globally. Consequently, ideological confrontation has been
reduced to a competition between states. While the prospect of nuclear confrontation in
Europe has significantly diminished, there remains the problem of reforming of Asian
socialism, limited as it may be to China, Vietnam and North Korea. Recent initiatives by
the United States to draw North Korea into the world community are encouraging and should
be continued. However the moves seem to be driven by need for reducing instability in the
Pacific Rim due to continuation of intransigence of the North Koreans. The impact of North
Korean behavior in other regions due to propensity to proliferate WMD technology should be
taken into account. They have been a source of missile proliferation to rogue states in
the Middle East and South Asia (Pakistan). The profile of these transfers notwithstanding,
North Korea was and remains a surrogate of Peoples Republic of China, and it the
latter that requires a closer examination.
The Chinese Challenge
In order to understand the challenge that China represents, one needs
to understand the challenge that the Soviet Union, another totalitarian state, once posed.
The superpower label used to describe the Soviet Union was misleading, in that Soviet
Union was chiefly an ideologically driven military and political power. Despite its
prodigious output during World War II and after, the Soviet Union was by no means an
economic power. Its inability to successfully transition from a war economy to a peacetime
consumer economy ultimately proved to be its undoing. The West, led by United States,
formulated the Containment policy in order to contain the spread of Soviet
power with its system of alliances. However one has to realize that the Soviet Union had
already reached its limits of its power soon after end of WWII. Its expansion in Eastern
Europe was due to the quest for buffer territory from Germany and later Western Europe.
Its forays out of its near abroad were limited and reciprocal. The Afghan war
stretched its resources and sapped its morale. The economic collapse that followed the
intervention led to its implosion and collapse as the other superpower.
China in contrast is both a rising economic and political power. Its
military though modernizing is limited to strategic weapons and does not have any real
capability to influence any major event in the near term. Unlike Soviet Union, which was
implementing a Western ideology, China's political thought is rooted in nationalism. It
has been beating back invaders for over 3000 years. Few nations can boast of its
continuity in history and a track record of survival. It has absorbed many invasions and
has survived each of them. Its interlude with Communism should be seen in that light as
another invasion an invasion of ideas.
Chinas evolution today represents the vision of two individuals-
Mao Ze Dung and Deng Xiao Peng. The Maos contributions are many, but key among them
is his role as nation builder. In particular, he unified China under communist rule,
obtained nuclear weapons, and consolidated Chinas place in the world. It took the
Soviet Union seventy years to realize the folly of its economic policies. China, on the
other hand, realized this in about thirty years and Deng launched the four modernizations
to transform it. Significant among them is the absence of any devolution of political
power. In fact soon after the modernization program was launched, the regime suffered a
jolt in the form of political dissent form of the Democracy Movement and led to the
Tienannmen Square massacres. This event shook the very core of the regime and hardened its
attitudes towards political dissent. The West hopes that by constructive engagement it can
bring about gradual changes to the Chinese polity. The hope is that the government will
transition from totalitarianism to authoritarianism to eventually democracy. The adoption
of pragmatic policies by Deng Xiao Peng, and end of Cold War show that it is making the
transition to authoritarian state. In all possibility this could be the most that will
happen. Engagement with the West is bringing about tremendous pressure for political
change from the newly rich. However, the regime in Beijing wants to keep all political
freedoms in control while it leapfrogs from ox-carts to a modern economy without giving up
anything on the political side. It fears democratization could derail the process of
modernization and undermine the authority of the Communist Party. Consequently, economic
liberalization has not been accompanied by political liberalization.
The challenge of Taiwan to the Chinese political system
Taiwans democratic transformation throws up a major ideological
challenge to the mainlands political system. Many mainlanders would question the
authoritarian nature of their state if the Taiwan experiment succeeds. The mainland is
tackling the challenge in two ways- by treating Taiwan as a renegade province it questions
the legitimacy of that political system which could undermine it- this is accompanied by
keeping up the military pressure and numerous threats. The second way is that of proposing
one country two systems type of government. Both these paths appear to be
aimed at buying time while it grows stronger. As can be seen the fight is internal and
will get resolved with the march of time. However it is in the interest of the world
community that Taiwan exists as an example of contrast to the people of China.
China and the World
China is a member of many of the power bodies of the world. Its
pretence at being a responsible international player is not matched by its actions on the
ground. Despite being a member of the UN Security Council its participation in
peacekeeping missions are few and that too in non-combatant roles. Despite being a member
of many international treaties it has proliferated weapons of mass destruction in its own
strategic interest and has thus spread suffering.
In order to understand its policy of proliferation, one must understand
that this constituted practicing war by other means. Realizing that direct war can be
costly, China has found the asymmetric weapon of proliferation to tie down its
challengers- declared and potential. Its nurturing the North Korean regime to tie down
South Korea and principally Japan has backfired. The latter is drawn more closely into
security arrangements with the US than during the Cold War. And possibly that could be a
goal of the Chinese- a Japan tied up in a relationship with the US is better than an
autonomous Japan. And North Korean belligerent moves have prompted the neighbors into
participating in US theater missile defenses, which in turn degrade Chinas posture.
Its proliferation to Pakistan has prompted India to unveil its nuclear capability and it
is a matter of time for the Indian posture to build up sufficiently to dissuade China. It
is contributing to the instability in the Middle East by proliferation and hopes to weaken
the US based alliances in the region. One has to see how this turns out in the future.
Taking a long view of Chinas history, the nearby regions have
suffered whenever China had a weak center. From the time of the Mongol invasions to the
colonial era, there has been negative fallout in the region whenever China had weak
regimes. However strong centers have also resulted in a spillover of hegemonistic
tendencies prompting a former Thai minister to say, "The best thing China can do is
stay together and stay at home!" What is desirable is a benign son of heaven in
Beijing for peace and prosperity in Asia and now in a globalized world. However till that
happens, one has to be on guard.
Threat to India and responses
The post Cold War was hoped to give rise to multiple poles. China sees
for itself a bipolar role globally and a unipolar role regionally. It is in this aspect
that its moves to check Indias rise to power should be seen. Most Indian observers
state that the loss of Tibet as a buffer has brought about problems in the Indo- Sino
relationship. However it is not understood that the occupation of Tibet was an essential
element of the Chinese worldview for gaining domination in Asia. It is the desire to
dominate and play a zero sum game that drives the dissonance in the relationship and than
mere border disputes. Here again it has taken advantage of the confusion among the Indian
elite in recognizing the challenge it presents to them. Here is an instance of Sun
Tzus precepts in practice to confuse the challenger in order to achieve strategic
surprise.
Ever since Sumdrong Chu, China seems to have decided that direct
confrontation is not a feasible option and has propped up Pakistan as a surrogate. The
proliferation of delivery systems started in late 1988 along with the declarations of
peace. It is notable that these transfers took place after the Cold War was waning and
appears to be part of a long-term strategy to tie up India locally. The hoped for response
did not materialize as India took steps to protect its strategic autonomy.
The potential areas where China could cause direct problems for India
are mainly two proliferation of WMD to Pakistan and support for insurgencies in the
North- East region. It can cause indirect problems through dragging its feet on the
unsettled border and veto Indias membership in world councils. Proliferation of
weapons and delivery systems to Pakistan increases instability and causes resources
diverted to defense related systems. The umbilical can only be cut by forceful posture
with Agni-III deployment and a visible the C3I system put in place. The nuclear tests in
the late nineties and the deployment of the deterrent will contribute in mitigating the
effects of the proliferation. Active dialog and steps have to be taken to raise the costs
to the proliferators to dissuade them. Pursuing peace efforts in Kashmir with the local
militants will go a long way to diffuse the situation and remove the rationale for
Pakistan to offer moral support to the militancy.
The trouble in North East and an unsettled border lead to increase or
sustained military/paramilitary expenditure, which reduces economic growth. These could be
accompanied by encouraging intransigence in neighbors- Myanmar etc. Here again a mixture
of economic and political measures should tackle the internal troubles. Integrating the
North East into the mainstream of the Indian economy is an urgent and required step and
should be pursued regardless. As regards the neighbors, expansion of BMIST, and a new
regional economic integration are needed to ensure ASEAN type of system. This should go a
long way in discouraging the propensity to support such behavior in neighbors.
Conclusion
Its threat is mainly an indirect one through proliferation to Pakistan
and support of insurgencies in the North East. It could also harass India by prolonging
the border settlement and oppose entry into world bodies. The response has to be increased
economic growth and regional integration to reduce propensity for conflict accompanied by
a watchful eye on defense related systems. As China eventually resolves for itself the
role that it wants to play in the world, India has to be on its guard. Chinas
attempts to constrain India are doomed to fail for India has historically never taken a
back seat to China. The realization should be that it is not that China directly threatens
India but rather it reduces and diminishes Indias power.