|

A
Family at War:
Myanmar
’s
Power Struggle and Purge
Laxman
Bahroo
Executive
Summary
In October 2004, a terse statement by the government of
Myanmar
announced that Lt. General Khin Nyunt had retired for health
reasons. The sudden “retirement” of the widely favored
future leader of
Myanmar
spurred wild speculation. Overnight speculation emerged in the
media about the removal and likely outcomes.
Much of the analysis was premature, based on existing
stereotypes and contained often repeated terms such as
“hardliner” and “reformer.” Some even erroneously
referred to the event as a coup.
Myanmar
’s government is shrouded in secrecy and more complex than
imagined by many outsiders.
This paper will attempt to elucidate the dynamics within
the regime, the power structure and the role of Khin Nyunt.
It will then examine factors that led to his removal and
the systematic purge of the government.
This paper will also examine the impact of these events
on the region and possible issues that may arise in the future.
Contents
Myanmar's
Politics
Power Struggle
The
Removal of Khin Nyunt and the Purge
List
of Recently Transferred or Retired Ministers
Abolishing the NIB
Current
Leadership
International
Reaction
Summary and Analysis
References and
Footnotes
Myanmar
’s Politics
Since 1989
Myanmar
has been ruled by the military junta initially named SLORC
(State Law and Order Restoration Council) and then renamed in
1992 as the SPDC (State Peace and Development Council).
The isolation imposed by the regime and the outside world
has resulted in a scarcity of information on the government.
The SPDC is hypothesized as a central committee that
controls various administrative aspects of the country. (see
figure1) It consists
of core officers that control the Department of Defense,
civilian cabinet, and intelligence agencies.
Senior General Than Shwe is the Chairman of the SPDC and
directly controls the Ministry of Defense.
Deputy Senior General Muang Aye is the Vice Chairman and
Commander in Chief of the Military.
Lt. General Khin Nyunt was (prior to October 2004) the
Prime Minister of Myanmar and oversaw the civilian affairs via
the cabinet and intelligence affairs via the OCMI (Office of the
Chief of Military Intelligence). The remainder of the SPDC
cabinet contains the Tri-service command and chiefs of Bureau of
Special Operations.
Lt. General
Khin Nyunt despite his third most senior position was considered
to be the most powerful man in the regime’s hierarchy.
The various positions allowed him to liaison with
influential international personalities and control the powerful
intelligence apparatus responsible for internal and external
espionage.[i]
Lt. General Khin Nyunt’s rise to power paralleled the
restructuring of
Myanmar
’s intelligence services.
In 1983, the North Korean terrorist bombing attempted to
assassinate the South Korean President Chun Doo Hwan.
The attack resulted in the dead of 21 people including
members of the South Korean cabinet.
The attack proved to be a major embarrassment for the U
Ne Win regime and it severed diplomatic ties with
North Korea
.[ii]
Subsequent investigation of the attack resulted in an
intelligence revamp.

Figure 1:
Schematic of the SPDC
The National
Intelligence Bureau (NIB) became the central intelligence body.
It was given control over Bureau of Special
Investigation, Criminal Investigation Department, Special
Investigation Department and Military Intelligence.
Some of these branches were previously located within the
Home Ministry. Additionally
the newly formed DDSI was formed but its exact purpose is not
known. Khin Nyunt was tasked as the Chief of Intelligence in the
revamping by General Ne Win.[iii]
Khin Nyunt’s profile continued to ascend with the
burgeoning intelligence apparatus.
Over the past
two decades,
Myanmar
’s intelligence services have expanded in size and power (see
figure 2). The Directorate
of Defense Services Intelligence (DDSI), technically a
part of the NIB, became the most powerful intelligence body. The
DDSI provided agents to the NIB, which was delegated to
reporting to the SPDC. The
DDSI initially had 14 subdivisions but by 2002 had grown to over
40 subdivisions. In 1992, the DDSI was tasked to report directly
to the intelligence chief instead of the regional commanders
setting up the military - intelligence divide.
The intelligence apparatus also spawned a think tank
named Office of Strategic Studies (OSS).
The cadre of the
OSS
was drawn from the highest achieving DDSI members.
The
OSS
was subdivided into five divisions and provided an academic
environment as well a sophisticated public image that served as
link with regional organizations.
The large intelligence apparatus was reorganized in 2002
into the Office of Chief of Military Intelligence (OCMI) which
became the main intelligence agency in
Myanmar
. Lt. General Khin
Nyunt headed the newly formed OCMI and the major subdivision
NIB, DDSI, and the
OSS
.[iv]
[v]

Figure 2:
The organization of the OCMI
Deputy Senior
General Muang Aye and his arch rival Lt. General Khin Nyunt were
known to be locked in a power struggle for several years.
According to many reports the two had very different
personalities and work habits. Lt General Khin Nyunt is a
product of the Officer Training School (OTS) and considered to
be more cosmopolitan with workaholic tendencies. He is rumored
to be a “moderate” in the SPDC regime.[vi]
On the other hand, Deputy Senior General Muang Aye dubbed a
“hardliner” graduated from the
Defense
Service
Academy
and rose thru the ranks of the army to the current position.[vii]
The two were reported to be involved in a power struggle for the
better part of the last decade.
Rumors of a power struggle first reached public attention
in 1998 after an unsuccessful assassination of Lt General Tin Oo.
Tin Oo, then Secretary 2 within the SPDC, was a Muang Aye
supporter. The assassination attempt was largely blamed on
dissident groups operating out of
Japan
. However, later
reports suggested that it might have been a diversion and that
the culprits were within
Myanmar
.[viii]
Rumors of a power struggle were further fueled in 2001
when Lt General Tin Oo and Major General Sit Muang (also a
supporter of Muang Aye & groomed for a potential leadership
position in the SPDC) were killed along with several other
officers and servicemen in a helicopter crash.[ix]
After the death of Tin Oo, Lt General Win Myint,
Secretary 3 and supporter of Lt General Khin Nyunt, took over
the duties without official tasking.
He was also considered next in line for the job.[x]
The position was officially left vacant for two years and
filled in 2003 by Lt General Soe Win who was later promoted to
Secretary 1 in the wake of Khin Nyunt’s promotion as Prime
Minister and replaced him as Prime Minister in October 2004.[xi]
General Ne
Win thru his charisma led a cult of personality and is
responsible for placing many the SPDC leaders in positions of
power. Senior
General Than Shwe and Lt General Khin Nyunt were both picked to
lead.[xii]
Lt General Khin Nyunt was known to have very close ties to Ne
Win and his family members. Shortly before his death, Ne Win’s
influence declined significantly due to health reasons,
corruption charges raised against his family and an alleged coup
attempt. The loss of
Ne Win, affected the regime disproportionately and hurt Khin
Nyunt within the junta. After
the discovery of the attempted coup plot by Ne Win’s family,
Khin Nyunt was told to end his association with them.[xiii]
Lt General Khin Nyunt was speculated to be involved in
the coup attempt and his public disappearance at the time of the
revelations further stoked rumors.[xiv]
The power
struggle extended beyond Muang Aye and Khin Nyunt, it was a
manifestation of institutional rivalry.
The much publicized power struggle between Prime Minister
Khin Nyunt and Deputy Senior General Muang Aye is a
representation of the friction between the armed forces and
intelligence sections of
Myanmar
’s security forces. While
the exact origin of the power struggle is not known, it is
possible that the reorganization which removed the intelligence
officers from scrutiny of the army
lead to friction between the more senior army officers
and junior ranking intelligence officers.
Additionally, intelligence officers would carry out
investigations of army units.
This further deepened the suspicion between the two
factions.[xv]
In 2001, shortly after Lt General Tin Oo’s death
reports surfaced about a downsizing of the Office of Strategic
Studies, the “think tank” of the government and part of the
intelligence apparatus. It
was reported that many of the
OSS
officers were reassigned to other positions.[xvi]
Another significant but largely over looked event was
reshuffle of the cabinet prior to the removal of Khin Nyunt.
In September 2004, several cabinet ministers with ties to
Khin Nyunt were retired. The
most notable was the retirement of Foreign Minister U Wing Aung
and his assistant. It
was stated that Minister U Wing Aung, was a former intelligence
officer with a long distinguished foreign service career and
closely tied to Khin Nyunt.
The positions were filled with two individuals with
little foreign policy experience.
U Nyan Win, Foreign Minister, was a commandant at
Defense
Staff
College
and the U Muang Myint, deputy Foreign Minister, hailed from the
Light Infantry.[xvii]
[xviii]
In addition, other replacements after the removal of Khin Nyunt
seem to indicate that the power struggle is between the military
and intelligence branches of the government.
The position of Prime Minister, Secretary 1, Secretary 2
and the bulk of the regional commanders are now held by
graduates of Defense Services Academy (DSA).[xix]
Deputy Senior General Muang Aye is the member of the first
graduating class of DSA.[xx]
The precise
events leading up to the retirement of Prime Minister Khin Nyunt
are unclear. However,
by examining media reports and official reports the last days of
Khin Nyunt in power can be pieced together.
In September 2004 revelations occurred about the
corruption within the OCMI.
It was discovered that members of the Ministry of
Immigration and Customs department within the OCMI at Muse
outpost on the Chinese border was involved in the smuggling of
gold, jade and money. The
Auditor General dispatched by SPDC confirmed the report and 186
members of the OCMI were arrested.[xxi]
At the time of the revelations, Prime Minister Khin Nyunt
was in
Singapore
accompanied by his wife and four ministers (Foreign Affairs,
Industry and Commerce, Finance and Revenue) and Deputy Foreign
Affairs. [xxii]
Upon return to
Yangon
, he was greeted by the members of the SPDC and the Foreign
Minister and Deputy Foreign Minister are retired and the
Minister of Commerce was reassigned.[xxiii]
The period
between
September 17, 2005
and
October 19, 2005
was characterized by a reshuffling of the cabinet members. In
the days prior to the
October 19, 2005
, Prime Minister Khin Nyunt continued his frenetic pace of
activity. On October
17th and 18th, there were no reports of
Khin Nyunt’s whereabouts and was presumed to be in
Mandalay
, the last known location. On
October 18th, the OCMI was raided by the army and the
next day, the retirement of Khin Nyunt was officially announced
by the government.[xxiv]
[xxv]
Khin Nyunt’s family was detained, additionally
Bagan Cybertech
,
Myanmar
’s largest internet service, was taken over by government
troops.[xxvi]
While the international media and politicians focused on
the retirement of Khin Nyunt and dim prospects of political
reform, the government continued the purge and reshuffled the
cabinet.[xxvii]
A significant number of ministers were replaced by
regional commanders, some with close ties to Senior General
Muang Aye.[xxviii]
List
of Recently Transferred or Retired Ministers
|
Name
|
Position
|
Situation
|
|
U Win
Aung
|
Foreign
Minister
|
Retired
|
|
U
Khin Maung Win
|
Deputy
Foreign Minister
|
Retired
|
|
Maj
Gen Hla Myint Swe
|
Transport
Minister
|
Dismissed
|
|
Maj
Gen Nyunt Tin
|
Agriculture
& Irrigation Minister
|
dismissed
|
|
Maj Gen
Pyi Sone
|
Commerce
Minister
|
Transferred
to PM office
|
|
U Tin
Win
|
Labor
Minister
|
Transferred
to PM office
|
|
Colonel
Tin Hlaing
|
Home
Minister
|
retired
|
|
Brig-Gen
Aung Thein
|
Deputy
Minister Livestock & Fisheries
|
dismissed
|
|
Nyi Hla
Nge
|
Deputy
Minister Science & Technology
|
Dismissed
|
|
Brig-Gen
Khin Maung
|
Deputy
Minister Agriculture & Irrigation
|
Dismissed
|
|
Brig-Gen
Kyaw Win
|
Deputy
Minister Industry
|
Dismissed
|
“The SPDC,
which is striving to establish a modern, disciplined and
democratic nation in line with the changing times, in the
interest of the people, the security and the tranquility of the
country, has found that the NIB [National Intelligence Bureau]
law is no longer practicable.”[xxix]
The removal of Khin Nyunt did not end the remodeling of
Myanmar
’s bureaucracy. The
SPDC has since continued to remove those loyal to Khin Nyunt,
deconstruct the influence of his intelligence organizations and
remove those suspected of corruption. The Junta released many
prisoners, the number ranging from a few thousand to nine
thousand.[xxx]
Among those released were several notable political
prisoners and others held illegally. Charges of corruption were
filed against senior OCMI staffers, currently many have been
found guilty and are awaiting sentencing.[xxxi]
Khin Nyunt has not stood trial but government statements imply
that he was held accountable for the corruption by his removal
and businesses owned by his family have been closed or taken
over.[xxxii]
In October
2004,
Myanmar
’s junta arrested almost all of the various department heads
in the OCMI and their deputies.
It is rumored that Brig General Aung Zaw, head of the
Administration department was killed in detention. Two notable
exceptions in the saga of detention and interrogation are
Brig-Gen Kyaw Thein,
head of ethnic nationalities and ceasefire groups, drugs
suppression, head of and
Naval and Air intelligence, the other is Maj-Gen Kyaw Win
Deputy Chief
of OCMI.[xxxiii]
Some OCMI staffers who had retired were also arrested
along with influential family members while others have been
transferred to infantry battalions or retired. Additionally,
family members of influential intelligence officers in military
school have been expelled.[xxxiv]
Businesses
owned by relatives of intelligence officers have been closed or
confiscated by the government.
Notable among the list of businesses involved is Myanmar
Times.[xxxv]
Since its inception the Myanmar Times bypassed the tight
controls set by Ministry of Information for
Myanmar
’s
newspapers. This
point was boasted by the OCMI members, the newspaper was
designed to set it apart from others and to put forth the
specific views of the OCMI instead of the government.[xxxvi]
Coincidentally, the CEO of this controversial newspaper is
“Sonny” Myant Swe, son of Thein Swe, the now arrested former
head of International Relations department of OCMI.[xxxvii]
|
Name
|
Position
|
Situation
|
|
Brig-Gen
Kyaw Thein
|
Head of
Ethnic Nationalities & Ceasefires, Drug Suppression
|
Retired
|
|
Maj-Gen
Kyaw Win
|
Deputy
Chief of OCMI
|
Retired
|
|
Brig
Gen Thein Swe
|
Head of
International Relations
|
Arrested
despite retirement
|
|
Brig-Gen
Hla Aung
|
Head
of Training
|
Arrested
|
|
Brig-Gen
Kyaw Han
|
Head
of Science & Technology
|
Arrested
|
|
Brig-Gen
Than Htun
|
Head
of Politics & Counter Intelligence
|
Arrested
|
|
Brig-Gen
Myint Zaw
|
Head
of Border Security and Intelligence
|
Arrested
|
|
Brig
Gen Aung Zaw
|
Head of
Administration Department
|
?
Killed in custody
|
Since the
removal of Prime Minister Khin Nyunt, the media has focused on
the remainder of
Myanmar
’s leadership. Senior
General Than Shwe has emerged in the spotlight along with the
senior SPDC members. Senior
General Than Shwe is a 72 year old veteran of the psychological
warfare division of the Tatmadaw in the Shan and Karen
engagements and also stationed in
Southwest Myanmar
. He rose to
prominence reaching the rank of Chief of the Army during the Ne
Win era and was later encouraged to form the SLORC government.
During the 1990’s he is known to have deeply influenced
the current senior members of SPDC with secret cabinet meetings
that determined future policy. It is believed that the current
purge surrounding Khin Nyunt is the handiwork of Than Shwe
rather than Deputy Senior General Muang Aye. Previously
portrayed as an aging lackluster brooding dictator, the media
portrays him as a savvy politician able to interact with
Myanmar
’s neighbors and strong links to national tycoons.
Additionally despite widely held speculation of slowly losing
grip on power to younger generals, he has now significantly
consolidated power after the removal of Khin Nyunt and the all
pervasive intelligence organizations. [xxxviii]
[xxxix]
Lt General
Soe Win replaced Khin Nyunt as Prime Minister of Myanmar.
Prime Minister Soe Win has a background that is
significantly different from Khin Nyunt, he is predominately a
military commander with previous postings in Karen and
Chin
State
. He was then
appointed to North West Command and first appointed to the SPDC
in 2001 as Air Defense General.
He gradually rose thru the ranks taking over Lt General
Tin Oo’s long vacant position as Secretary 2.
In 2003 he was promoted to Secretary 1 as Khin Nyunt was
appointed Prime Minister. He
is reported to be a “hardliner” with his role in the 1988
crackdown against democracy protestors and alleged to be the
involved in the Depyin attack on NLD (National League of
Democracy) and the arrest of Aung Sang Suu Kyi.
He is reported to be a close associate of SPDC Chairman
Than Shwe and a member of the USDA (Union Solidarity and
Development Association) a civilian organization designed to
support the military regime against the NLD.[xl]
Lt General
Thein Sein, Secretary 1 entered into SPDC in 2001 as replacement
of then Secretary 3 Adjutant Gen Win Myint who was considered to
be a Khin Nyunt supporter. Currently,
his duties allow participation in the National convention,
reassuring restive minority groups about political reform and
will honor negotiated ceasefires.[xli]
Lt General Thura Shwe Mann, Secretary 2 of the SPDC,
regime is also a graduate of Defense Service Academy (DSA).
He has steadily advanced in the ranks of the Army and a
veteran of the KNU insurgency.[xlii]
In 1997, he joined the SPDC as a regional commander and
then promoted up to Triservice Command in 2001. He is the
regime’s most vocal anti corruption member and has sounded off
on corruption at the OCMI.[xliii]
Currently, the top five generals are soldiers with long
history of insurgent engagements and are widely respected and
trusted in the armed forces.
Almost all except Senior General Than Shwe are graduates
of the DSA. Overall,
it seems to indicate that the top two generals in the junta have
consolidated their power over the government.
“We will be
having our own forum in the Asean [Association of Southeast
Asian Nations] to convey our views to the new leadership of
Myanmar
.”
-
Philippines
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo
ASEAN reacted
with predicted surprise to the removal of Prime Minsiter Khin
Nyunt. Khin Nyunt
held multiple portfolios and this afforded him extensive travel
abroad and interaction with foreign diplomats in
Myanmar
. Therefore, he was
the primary source of ASEAN interaction with the
Myanmar
’s regime. The
reaction over his removal ranged from concern over Khin
Nyunt’s health to anger over stalled reforms.
The ASEAN meeting continued the trend with sharp
criticism over the SPDC’s decision to extend Ang San Suu
Kyi’s house arrest by one year. The People’s Republic of
China
issued a tepid reaction to the removal of Khin Nyunt and wished
Myanmar
stability in its reforms ahead.
India
’s reaction to the removal was muted and relations continued
unabated with Sen General Than Shwe’s state visit, the first
in 24 years.[xliv]
[xlv]
[xlvi]
Several days
after the removal of Khin Nyunt, the New Light of Myanmar
announced that Senior General Than Shwe would visit
India
. The visit came at
a surprising time given internal upheavals and start of a purge.
Numerous reasons were cited ranging from bolstering ties
to astrologic significance.
Regardless of the reasons, Senior General Than Shwe visit
was significant as it included an entourage of Lt General Thein
Sein, SPDC Secretary 1, several junior SPDC members, and eight
cabinet ministers including Industry, Communications, External
Affairs, Railways, and Science and Technology.
It was the first visit by
Myanmar
’s head of state since President Ne Win several decades ago.[xlvii]
[xlviii]
An agreement on non traditional security was signed to curtail
money laundering, cybercrime, organized crime and terrorism.[xlix]
High level visits continued with Air Chief Marshal S.
Krishnaswamy in November 2004 that involved ceremonial and
retreat spots. However,
several days after the visit, Tatmadaw struck NSCN camps in its
territory.[l]
Most recently, Minister of External Affairs K Natwar
Singh visited
Myanmar
to further bolster bilateral ties and gave importance to
upcoming Tamanthi Hydel project and the
Kaladan
River
bimodal transport system.[li]
China
continued to maintain high level of interaction despite the
removal of Khin Nyunt and his known pro
China
proclivity. In
September 2004, Chinese leadership met with Brigadier General
Htay Oo, chief of the USDA (Union Solidarity and Development
Association). [lii]
The USDA is considered the political organization of the SPDC
formed as a reaction to the NLD.
The USDA and its chief are believed to be heavily
patronized by Senior General Than Shwe.[liii]
Interestingly, several days after the landmark visit to
India
, the new Prime Minister Soe Win traveled to
China
as part of an ASEAN delegation.
His entourage included 55 delegates mostly involving
economy and industry.[liv]
[lv]
Following quickly on Prime Minister Soe Win’s visit
China
sent Deputy Chief of Staff of the People’s Liberation Army,
General Ge Zhenfeng to sign an agreement on border defense and
discuss management of border defense.
Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs, Wu Dawei arrived on
December 2004 on an official trip that was speculated to engage
new members of the SPDC.[lvi]
Summary
and
Analysis
Former Prime
Minister Khin Nyunt’s windfall started with the unfortunate
terrorist bombing of the South Korean delegation.
In the ensuing purge he was tasked to head the amalgam of
various intelligence organizations.
Over time he expanded the role of intelligence
organizations and rose to further prominence in the Ne Win
administration. In
the post 1988 chaos, Ne Win encouraged Senior General Than Shwe
to incorporate Lt General Khin Nyunt into the leadership of the
newly formed SLORC. In
the evolution of the SLORC into the SPDC, Khin Nyunt was able to
further his role by rerouting intelligence inputs directly to
his office. The
supremacy of the DDSI (over the ceremonial NIB) and creation of
the OCMI along with the
OSS
think tank further increased his influence in the regime.
It resulted in speculation that he would be the next
leader of
Myanmar
either by choice or by power struggle.
These rumors were given further impetus in 2003 when he
became Prime Minister. The
exact motivation for this move is not known.
One suspects that it was either a reflection of Khin
Nyunt’s rising international stature.
He was able to successfully build a cult of personality
around him and many considered the intelligence chief a
“moderate” based on numerous interactions with foreign
dignitaries and regular meeting with Ang Sang Suu Kyi in which
he represented the SPDC. Another more cynical reason for his
promotion as Prime Minister is that the regime wanted to
distance him from the intelligence organization thru which he
wielded much of his power.
The infamous
power struggle touted by the media while between Deputy Senior
General Muang Aye and Lt General Khin Nyunt was between the two
factions of the government.
The earliest cause can be traced back to 1992 revamping
in which intelligence officers reported directly to DDSI instead
of higher ranking army commanders.
In this situation, the intelligence officers became
insolent towards their superiors and were able to report on
them. It is possible
the rivalry may have even been present in the Ne Win era after
the restructuring of intelligence apparatus.
The expansion of the OCMI and the running of a nearly
parallel institution including its own newspaper only fueled the
rivalry. Over time
the rivalry waxed and waned.
The death of Tin Oo and Sit Muang, supporters of Deputy
Senior General Muang Aye and the tasking of Win Myint, Khin
Nyunt associate and then Secretary 3 to Tin Oo’s task cast a
suspicious shadow. The
power struggle was also cast along ideological lines of
moderates Vs hardliners. It
is simplistic bordering on erroneous to term a power struggle in
these terms. The
intelligence faction is responsible for internal espionage and
detention of suspected “subversives” much of which is
directed against NLD and other pro democracy groups.
It would be sufficient to state the nearly all of
Myanmar
’s generals would not want to share power or share only in
very favorable terms. Additionally,
a consolidation of power in the hands of the army instead of the
intelligence service does not mean that reforms are less likely
or more likely to occur.
The casus
belli of recent events seems to be the discovery of corruption
at the Muse checkpoint. It
is hardly surprising that the intelligence apparatus would not
be involved in corruption given the depth of involvement in the
government and ownership of numerous businesses.
Nonetheless, perhaps the discovery pointed to a deeper
and more widespread occurrence that finally forced the regime to
act decisively against the OCMI.
The events from
September 17, 2004
to
October 19, 2004
seem to indicate that there might have been attempts to reach a
settlement. Khin
Nyunt arrived from
Singapore
with several ministers. U Win Aung and his deputy were
immediately relieved of duty and several others who accompanied
the former Prime Minister were either retired or relocated.
Over the next month, a series of transfers occurred and
their replacements interestingly enough were “loyal” army
commanders. Allegedly
a heated argument occurred between Khin Nyunt and Than Shwe over
resignation from the OCMI. Khin
Nyunt refusal may have directly led to his dismissal.
Later it was noted by several prominent members in the
government that the former Prime Minister had to be held
accountable for actions within his department.
The
government has gone beyond the removal of Khin Nyunt, it seeks
to deconstruct the cult of personality built around him by
removing many of his achievements.
The announcement of Khin Nyunt’s retirement for health
reasons, resulted in criticism of the junta for contriving
careless excuses that seemed unbelievable.
However, its actions with regards to the OCMI were
precise if not lethal. Army
troops raided the OMCI headquarters and netted nearly all of the
main department heads. Many
of them are in custody and some have been tried, some like Brig
General Thein Swe were brought out of retirement and then held
accountable. It is
interest to note that both the Deputy Director and Head of
Ethnic affairs and ceasefire have been retired.
It seems that the government while interested in taking
apart the OCMI is not willing to undo some of its contributions.
In fact, the SPDC has taken numerous steps to comfort restive
minorities. Many of
the ceasefires were engineered by Khin Nyunt and he headed the
Constitutional convention consisting of prominent ethnic leaders
during his removal. The
junta in a bid to calm fears of backtracking on previous
agreements sent Prime Minster Soe Win and other SPDC members to
discuss issues with various ethnic groups.
In the purge, the NIB formed at the time of the last
purge was disbanded and the remnant of the much downsized OCMI
is allowed to exist. The
local control of intelligence has now reverted back to regional
commanders. They
have removed or transferred cabinet members who might have
similar sympathies.
The diaspora's
reactions over the removal of Khin Nyunt ranged from anger to
happiness. Many were
angry at the loss of a reformer and feared a more hard-line tone
against the Ang Sang Suu Kyi, NLD and even ethnic minorities.
Other opinions in the press expressed happiness at the
removal of the intelligence chief and stated prematurely that
this was the beginning of the end of the junta.
International reactions were more balanced.
India
and
China
wished
Myanmar
stability and hoped that reforms and transition would continue
at their pace. ASEAN,
a patchwork collection of
Myanmar
’s neighbors, expressed a multitude of reactions.
Many of them echoed the above quote of
Philippines
President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.
The quote and the thoughts behind it are incorrect.
Myanmar
does not have a new government, it has a new administration, the
top two leadership positions have not changed hands.
Many in ASEAN issued strong statements against the
removal, despite the infamous ASEAN way of “non
interference”. It
seems ASEAN has bought into Khin Nyunt persona of a moderate -
reformer in a hard-line regime.
ASEAN’s preference in
Myanmar
’s
longstanding power struggle remains exposed by its comments over
the removal of Khin Nyunt. Several
countries likely had successful business dealing with either
Khin Nyunt or his organizations.
A well known one is Bagan Cybertech’s dealing with
Shinawatra Satellite Plc.
The recent ASEAN meeting demonstrated the group’s anger
at
Myanmar
and its lack of democratic reforms.
Interestingly
Thailand
threatened to walk out if its internal issues were discussed and
Malaysia
and
Indonesia
hardly have stellar democratic credentials.
Yet, ASEAN leaders have threatened to kick out
Myanmar
over sins committed by other members.
The initial
report of the removal of Khin Nyunt speculated on possible
changes in
Myanmar
’s foreign policy given his pro-China leanings.
It is unlikely that foreign policy played a role in the
removal. Regardless
of the top leadership’s view of
China
,
Myanmar
cannot simply walk away from 15 years of strong engagement
spanning economic, military and political aspects.
The change, if any, in foreign policy will be in subtle
degrees rather than a major mid course correction.
China
however continues to engage the junta.
Economic issues of widening the
Irrawaddy
, border security and political issues continue to be discussed.
Chinese Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Wu Dawei was
dispatched to
Myanmar
to evaluate the new administration.
India
continues to engage
Myanmar
’s leadership, the landmark visit by Senior General Than Shwe
after the removal of Khin Nyunt and signed a non traditional
security agreement.
India
has followed up the momentum of the state visit with military
ties and discussion of mutual political issues and economic
projects. It can be
hypothesized that ties between
Myanmar
and
India
will continue to improve and deepen.
Myanmar
will continue to position itself in between both
India
and
China
for maximum benefit.
The long
awaited power play in
Myanmar
between Deputy Senior General Muang Aye and Lt General Khin
Nyunt has been overtaken by recent events and turned on its
head. The original
prediction was that as Senior General Than Shwe aged, he would
lose grip on power resulting in a tensing of the relations
between the two potential leaders.
However the events of October 2004, the struggle has been
between Senior General Than Shwe’s reassertion of control over
the government and the removal of Prime Minister Khin Nyunt and
the intelligence faction challenge.
In short this was a power play between cousins in
military and intelligence factions.
The army commanders and their loyalists seem to hold the
major positions in the new administration.
The threat from the intelligence factions has been
reduced by the recent purge. This, however, does not mean that
the government will not be subject to further upheavals.
Transfer of power in military government is rarely if
ever smooth and the future of
Myanmar
is uncertain both externally and internally.
Externally, it must deal with ASEAN’s threats and
Western sanctions. Internally,
Myanmar
faces the task of co-opting ethnic minorities and dissident
political groups into nation rather than a country.
Myanmar
’s purge is the start of a long road of reform involving
intelligence services, interaction with other ethnicities, and
the international arena.
To
our distant relatives and extended families, the ones who first
teach us about power plays and politics
[iv]
“Burma/Myanmar: How Strong is the Military Regime?”
International Crisis Group
December 21, 2000
|