
SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES
|
(Source: ISRO) High Res GSLV Model Photo (575kb) High Res GSLV Model Photo (800kb) |
GSLV (Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle) - Mk-I The GSLV
(Geostationary Satellite Launch Vehicle) Mk-I is a heavy communication
satellite launcher developed to enable India to launch its own INSAT-class
2,000 to 2,500Kg satellites into Geo-Transfer-Orbit (GTO) for Indian
and foreign communication satellite market. The GSLV has four liquid propellant strap-on indigenous Vikas motors (L40) based on Ariane Viking-2 engine of SEP, which are ignited on the ground, to augment the first stage thrust. Each of the L40 liquid propellant strap-on motors carries 40 tonne of hypergolic propellant (UDMH and N2O4) stored in two independent tanks of 2.1 meter diameter in tandem, the gas generator fed engine burn for 160 seconds and produces 680 kN thrust. GSLV-D2 onwards use uprated version of the Vikas engine tested in December 2001 that develop higher chamber pressure of 58.5 bar against 52.5 bar in the previous version. This new engine uses UH25 (a mixture of Unsymmetrical Di-methyl Hydrazine and hydrazine hydrate) as fuel and nitrogen tetroxide as oxidizer, its new silica-phenolic throat allows extended duration of burning time. It is estimated to increase the stage ISP by about 7 seconds[39] , raising GSLV's GTO payload capability by 150Kg[40] . The L40H is used as booster strapon motor with 42 tonne fuel and L37.5H used as second stage with 39 tonne fuel.
The vented inter-stage between the first and second stage, enables the firing of the second stage 1.6 seconds before the first stage has completed its thrusting action. This design avoids use of additional systems needed to provide sufficient acceleration between the time before the ignition of second stage takes place and sufficient reduction in velocity of the first stage[41] . The second stage L37.5/L37.5H employs indigenously built Vikas engine based on the Viking-4A engine of SEP France and carries 37.5/39 tonne of liquid propellant - Unsymmetrical Di-Methyl Hydrazine (UDMH) as fuel and Nitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) as oxidizer, stored in two compartments of a common tank separated by a common bulkhead. The gas generator fed engine burns for 150/136 secs and produce 720/804 kN thrust. Pitch & yaw control is obtained by hydraulically gimbaled engine (±4) and two hot gas reaction control for roll. When the stage is expended retro-rocket provide separation velocity.
The 7.8 m long and 3.4 m diameter metallic bulbous heat shield of GSLV, of isogrid construction, protects the spacecraft during the GSLV's passage through the dense atmosphere. It is discarded at an altitude of around 115 Km. The inertial navigation and guidance system Redundant Strap Down Inertial Navigation System/Inertial Guidance System (RESINS/(IGS) which is housed in the equipment bay computes the inertial position and velocity and guides the vehicle from lift-off to spacecraft injection. GSLV
will be declared operational after one more successful developmental
flights (D3). GSLV-D1 successfully launched 1540Kg GSAT-1 satellite
into GTO on 18-April-2001 and GSLV-D2 launched 1825Kg GSAT-2 to GTO
on 8-May-2003 . Commercial flights C1, C2 & C3 is already budgeted,
including long lead-time items for C4, C5 & C6 [43] . Efforts
are already on to improve the payload in GTO in progressive steps
of 2,200Kg, 2,300 Kg and 2450Kg by 2006 [44]. Other than GTO missions,
GSLV can also perform mission to LEO and polar missions. |
Launches: 2. Failures: 0. Success Rate: 100% pct. First Launch Date: 18 April 2001, Last Launch Date: 8 May 2003. LEO Payload: 6,200kg. to: 200 km Orbit. at: 19.0 degrees. Payload: 2,250 kg. to a Geosynchronous transfer trajectory. Liftoff Thrust: 795,500 kgf. Total Mass: 414,000 kg. Core Diameter: 2.8 m. Total Length: 49.0 m. Flyaway Unit Cost $: 30.00 million. in 2003 unit dollars.
GSLV-D1
|
|
GS1 |
GS2 |
GS3 |
Payload
Faring |
|
|
Gross_Mass
[45] |
45,600
Kg |
157,300Kg |
43,000
Kg |
15,000
Kg |
1,250
Kg |
|
Motor
Mass-Ratio |
? |
?. |
?
|
?
|
N.A. |
|
Thrust@Vacuum
Thrust@Sea_Level (Burn_Time)
|
69,388Kgf
Kgf (
160 sec) |
479,592Kgf
Kgf (100
sec) |
73,470Kgf
N.A (150
sec) |
|
N.A. |
|
Specific-Impulse
Isp@Vacuum
Isp@Sea_Level [51] |
281
sec 248
sec |
269
sec 237
sec |
295
sec 200
sec |
|
N.A. |
|
Length Diameter Dynamic
Envelop |
19.7
m 2.1
m |
20.3
m 2.8
m |
11.6
m 2.8
m |
8.7
m 2.8
m |
7.8
m
[45]
3.4
m
[46]
3.05 |
|
Chamber
Pressure [56] Expansion
Ratio |
52.5
bar 13.9:1
|
58.8
bar 8:
1 |
52.5
bar 31:1 |
198
:1 |
N.A. |
|
Propellant Chemical Case
material |
Liquid UDMH+N2O4 Aluminum
Alloy |
Solid HTPB/AP/Al M250
Maraging |
Liquid UDMH+N2O4 Steel |
Cryogenic LH2
& LOX Aluminum
Alloy |
N.A. |
|
Control
system |
Engine
Gimbal Control |
Multi-port
SITVC |
EGC
two plane gimballing for pitch & yaw control. Hot gas RCS for
roll control. |
Two
swivellable vernier engine for thrust phase and cold
gas RCS during coast phase. |
GSLV-D2
| (L40H) strapon | GS1 (S139) | GS2 (L37.5H) | GS3 (C12.5) | Payload Faring | |
|
Gross_Mass [57] |
45,600
Kg [59] 42,000 Kg 5,600 Kg (0.882) [60] |
157,300Kg 138,000Kg 28,300Kg (0.820) |
44,500
Kg [61] 39,000 Kg 5,500 Kg (0.876 ) [62] |
15,000
Kg 12,600 Kg 2,500 Kg [63] (0.833 ) |
1,250 Kg |
| Motor Mass-Ratio | ? | ? | ? | ? | N/A |
|
Thrust@Vacuum |
78,061Kgf Kgf ( 149 sec) |
483,265Kgf Kgf (107 sec) |
82,041Kgf N.A (136 sec) |
7,500Kgf N.A (705 sec) (I'st burn 500 sec [64]) |
N/A |
|
Specific-Impulse |
288
sec [66] 255 sec [67] |
269
sec 237 sec |
302
sec [68] 207 sec [69] |
454sec N.A. |
N/A |
| Length Diameter Dynamic Envelop |
19.7
m |
20.1
m |
11.6
m |
8.7
m |
7.8
m [70] 3.4 m [71] 3.05 |
| Chamber
Pressure (Pc) [72] Expansion Ratio |
58.5
bar ? |
58.8
bar 8: 1 |
58.5
bar ? |
55.9
bar 198 :1 |
N.A. |
| Propellant Chemical Case material |
Liquid UH25+N2O4 Aluminum Alloy |
Solid HTPB/AP/Al M250 Maraging |
Liquid UH25+N2O4 Steel |
Cryogenic LH2 & LOX Aluminum Alloy |
Aluminum Alloy |
| Number of Engines | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | N/A |
| Control system | Engine Gimbal Control | Multi-port SITVC | EGC two plane gimballing for pitch & yaw control. Hot gas RCS for roll control. | Two swivellable vernier engine for thrust phase and cold gas RCS during coast phase. |
GSLV
Flights:
GSLV-D1
Flight date & time: 18 April
2001, 15:43 IST, Satish Dhawan Space Center, SHAR, Sriharikota
Payload: GSAT-1 (1,540 Kg)
Flight sequence, result and discussion: Successful GTO launch. Orbit: 181 x 32,051Km. Inclination: 19.2°
While the first GSLV developmental test flight is primarily intended for validating the vehicle design and its performance parameters as well as the associated ground infrastructure, the flight opportunity is also made use of to place an experimental satellite GSAT-1 weighing about 1540 kg. GSAT-1 was used to prove new spacecraft elements like 10-Newton bipropellant Reaction Control Thrusters, Fast Recovery Star Sensors and Heat Pipe Radiator Panels to validate them before using them in the ISRO operational ISRO satellites like IRS and INSATs. GSAT-1 also carried two C-band transponders employing 10W Solid State Power Amplifiers (SSPAs), one C-band transponder using 50 W Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier (TWTA) and two S-band transponders using 70W TWTA. The satellite had 119kg (dry mass) unified bipropellant liquid propulsion system made up of a single 440 N Liquid Apogee Motor (LAM) and two redundant networks of 8´ 22 N RCS thrusters for final orbital placement[73].
GSLV-D1's initial launch on 18 March 2001 was aborted one second before lift-off by the Automatic Launch Processing System when it detected that one of the L40 stage strapon did not develop required thrust, the fault's root cause was "defective plumbing in the oxidizer flow line" that was fixed by replacing it with a spare stage and successful launch 18 days later.
The GTO launch had a launch velocity shortfall of 0.6% (mainly due to Cryogenic stage thrust phase shortfall of 4.1 seconds; 705.8 seconds instead of 709.9) but well within the capability of the satellite to correct the error as it performs orbit-raising maneuver from GTO to SSO whereby the orbital major axis is raised from 18,000Km to 36,000Km. Through a series of six orbital maneuvers conducted between April 19 and 23, the satellite's orbit was raised to near-geosynchronous height with an apogee of 35,665 km, a perigee of 33,806 km and an inclination of 0.997°.
During the initial orbit raising maneuver an unexpected problem arose whereby LAM fuel mixture was unbalanced due to a fault in dissimilar fuel tanks used to store the propellant, resulting in wasted fuel as well as spacecraft's center of gravity drifted beyond the main LAM motor gimbal swing limit making the flight uncontrollable. Mission control at MCF failed to notice and stop this serious fault as it unfolded. By the time the situation was correctly assessed the only available way to raise the orbit was to use the LAM in conjunction with 4 smaller RCS (reaction control thrusters) that are less fuel efficient (LAM specific impulse (ISP) of 310 against RCS-thruster ISP of 280), the bold strategy allowed raising the GSAT orbit very close to the intended GSO, in spite of initial fuel loss due to fuel tank flow problem. In the end using the new thruster strategy the spacecraft was short of 10 kg fuel to reach the intended 36,000Km GSO orbit. GSAT is drifting 13.212 deg per day with orbital period 23 hours, apogee 35,665 km, perigee 33,806 km, and inclination 0.99 deg. The fully functional transponders and transmitters on board were deactivated on instructions of the International Telecommunications Union.
G. Madhavan Nair, Director, VSSC, later explained: "Last time we had a problem in the total management of the cryogenic fluid in the upper stage. Some anomaly was observed in terms of fuel consumption and management." The problem was analysed thoroughly by means of a series of tests in Russia and ISRO's laboratories here. "Based on these, we fine-tuned the performance of the upper (cryogenic) stage," he added. [74]
GSLV-D2
Flight date & time: 8 May 2003,
16:58 IST, Satish Dhawan Space Center, SHAR, Sriharikota
Payload: GSAT-2 (1,825 Kg) Cost
150 Cr for launcher and 50Cr fro GSAT-2 [75].
Flight
sequence, result and discussion:
Successful GTO launch. Orbit: 180 x 36,000Km. Inclination: 19.2°
The accurate launch injected the satellite at targeted orbit. The autopilot cut off the cryo engine 17 seconds before the last stage fully used the balance 300Kg fuel, indicating true payload capability of at least 2,125 Kg. The increased payload capability as compared to GSLV-D1 was realized by:
1. Improved higher chamber pressure Vikas engine used in booster strap-ons
and second stages.
2. Enhanced propellant loading in all stages.
3. Lighter structural elements. (e.g. No STIVC on GS1 core, lighter equipment
bay & payload adapter).
This mission flight qualified the high chamber pressure Vikas engines (L40H and L37.5H) with distinctly higher ISP and thrust towards greater payload in future GSLV and PSLV flights.
The GSAT2 satellite
scientific & communication payload would greatly benefit fundamental science,
novel space applications and qualify components for more sophisticated future
satellites.
GSLV-Mk III & IV relative size w.r.t. previous launchers (click on image for Higher Res. version)
The GSLV Mk-1 launcher uses Russian cryo stage. India paid Glavkomos to develop the technology for cryogenic LOX/LH2 engine that is also the first Russia LOX/LH2 engine. ISRO took up the CUSP (Cryogenic Upper Stage Project) challenge after the United States illegally arm-twisted Russia in April 1992 and July 1993 not to sell the cryogenic technology know-how to India[76]. The U.S. falsly claimed that the sale would violate the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) guidelines since cryogenic technology could be used to propel missiles. Russia, however, agreed to sell seven cryogenic stages and a ground mock-up stage instead of the stipulated five stages and technology.
India didn't seriously embark on the development of either cryogenic or semi-cryogenic engines, though it came very close to sustaining such programs in the early 1970s. For their initial experiments, ISRO scientists worked to build an engine using liquid oxygen (LOX) and kerosene [77]. When India was collaborating closely with SAP in France in the development of a liquid propulsion engine, France appeared to have offered to share its knowledge of HM7 cryogenic engine for a very nominal amount. Again, because of its perceived and overwhelming commitment to the development of VIKAS engine, India appeared to have allowed that offer to lapse. Later ISRO began work on the development of a cryogenic engine in the 1980s when it tested a single element injector generating 60 kg thrust. A one-tonne subscale engine was also realized and tested up to 600 seconds. With this, development of the cryogenic engine for use in the GSLV was initiated in 1994.
GSLV-
Mk-2 will be an improved version with greater payload capability (upto 2,250
Kg [78]) on the fourth flight due in 2005 [79]that will use:
The GSLV Mk-III is an entirely new launch vehicle and is not derived from PSLV or GSLV-Mk-I/II. In April-2002, Indian government approved Rs. 2498 crores (US$ 520M) for development of GSLV Mk-III able to launch 4,400 kg satellite to GTO, or 10 tonne to LEO by 2007/2008, with growth potential towards a 6,000kg payload capability through minor improvements.
GSLV Mk-III will be a three-stage launch vehicle with first stage consisting of two S200 Large Solid Booster (LSB) with 200 tonne solid propellant stage, that are strapped to the second stage L110 restartable stage (with 110 tonne liquid propellant & 4-meter diameter). The L110 stage will be first Indian liquid engine cluster design with two [87]improved Vikas engines each of 75 tonne thrust. The improved Vikas engine will use regenerative cooling [88]with superior weight & ISP characteristics. The new S200 booster stage each with 3.4-meter [89]diameter and 25 meter long, would be a scaled up version of mature S125 technology, with estimated enhanced thrust of 785 tonne. The L110 stage will be air lit before the S200 strapon are expended. This would also involve developing a bigger and more powerful C25 cryogenic restartable upper stage with 25 tonne LOX/LH2 propellant, and 20 tonne thrust [90], 4-meter diameter and 8.2 meter long. GSLV-Mk III will have a lift-off weight of about 630 tonne and will be 42.4 meters tall. The large payload fairing of 5-meter diameter and payload volumes of 100 cu meter. Unlike the earlier GSLV types first stage of GSLV Mk-III will not require fins due to availability of adequate control from the large stapon motors.
This new launch vehicle development is a major endeavor for ISRO. Most challenging aspects focus around development of huge S200 Large Solid Booster and the C25 Lox/LH2 cryo stage.
The development work on Mark-III began in October 2002. New facilities will be established at Sriharikota and Mahendragiri to develop the solid boosters, the core liquid stage and the cryogenic stage. A massive plant will come up at Sriharikota to produce solid propellants for Mark III. This will be in addition to the existing Solid Propellant Booster Plant (SPROB) facility at SHAR, one of the biggest plants of its kind in the world. The private and public sector industries taking part in the project too have to augment their facilities for the realization of Mark III hardware [91].
ISRO will establish and commission its new facilities for the project within two years. The first hardware will start rolling out in the second half of 2005, and static and structural tests will begin in 2006. ISRO is aiming the first launch of GSLV Mark III towards the end of 2007 or the first half of 2008 [92].
The subsequent GSLV Mk-IV
based on GSLV Mk-III would likely have two additional S200 strapons and bigger
160 to 200 tonne core stage with more Vikas engines in the cluster.
Definition of terms [93]