|
India
in Space - 2020
Dr.
T. P. Sasikumar
Introduction
Indian
Space Program has been thriving. The data and the
details can be reviewed from the official sites[i] of ISRO as well as from
unofficial sites[ii].
Thus, we shall not discuss those details here. The
aim of the essay is to see what the Indian Space
Program could do by 2020.
Bharadwaja’s
Yentra Sarvaswa (Amsubhodhini) in
AD-300; Sayana Bhashya for Rig Veda
in AD-1300; Sishyadhi Vrudhithanthram in
AD-784 etc. all deal with most scientific space
related activities. Described in the old text are
space scientists as ‘khedasastrajnan’ who have
defined the vimana; which has been studied
and experimented by Germans. The astronomical
knowledge in India was superb. The facts and the
history tell us that we were well advanced when
other nations were under the forest with no
developmental activities in hand.
Today
we are look at the so-called the developed nations
and have to decide what India is to do, not in the
space activity alone but in all the other fields
too. The idea is not to talk against the
globalization and the information era. The reality
remains that, as we are not trying to find and fit
the technology for the need of the nation.
Indeed,
we are happy to see that the place of Indian
activity being placed at international level. When
Indian data and the space being quoted by the
other nations, we feel proud. In this, we have
forgotten the natives’ requirements. We could
neither win there (India is not among the best 20
space countries even with many RS satellites on
space – source: News paper quote during July
2003 from the UN survey) nor could we justify the
native applications.
The
next 17 years our space goals need to be for the
betterment of the country - a dedicated service to
the nation. Closer interaction with the private
and public industries and the governmental
agencies to see the application of space reaches
the large public.
Man
Power
Indian
space scientists are second to none. The source of
development is indigenous. The activities are not
being spread nationwide. The load and the demand
on the individual scientists are high during the
launching of the satellite. This activity is only
at certain centers in the space department. The
application and the user interaction departments
have a leisured activity. The manpower needs to be
given target specific activity and not R&D in
the true sense. The real man power audit with the
project and the application in hand need to be
done and reoriented for the actual on the field
application support with area wise demarcation and
connections to the user agencies.
Succession
The
first and the second-generation manpower of ISRO
have a lot of gap. The prime power and the core
idea group are those at the highest level. The
spreading is very little in the case of
responsibilities at the lower levels. The patch
job and the piece-meal is the life at the lower
level. The information hierarchy is strictly
followed along with the administrative hierarchy
in ISRO, which is not very good for the progress.
The problem will be that the first generation
people will vacate the chair from 2005 to 2010 and
the gap is a problem for ISRO. The study on the
impact this will have on the future needs to be
seriously undertaken and a proper manpower
planning with long-term strategy needs to be
initiated.
Vehicle
Technologies
The
launch vehicle capability of ISRO is proved beyond
doubt by the successive successes in these days.
The design and the mathematical study of the
avatar, the space plane with the liquid hydrogen
fuel to reach into the space, indicate the vision
of ISRO. Thus the reaching out to outer space and
higher and higher is in the activity plans of ISRO
and this will take us into more laurels.
Satellite
Building
The
communication satellite with more and more
bandwidth and higher capabilities are not an
issue. The large number of satellites for more
transponder support is needed, as the
communication is the order of the day. The Remote
sensing satellite needs higher telescopic
resolution. The mechanism to achieve higher
imaging vistas with the available CCD array and
the spectral filters need to be explored. The
requirement of the users needs to be understood
well before getting into the design. The
experiments with the bacteriological and the ocean
study group in the design and the assured usage of
OceanSat and the MetSat need to be spread into
other application areas too.
Industry
Collaboration
The
space in India is being supportive and also
supported by the industries. There are many more
areas where in including the research and
development that can be invested into. The effort
to study this need to be taken up. The
collaboration is mainly in the satellite and
vehicle building area, the effort for more
application spreading and data distribution need
to be carried out. The user support and the
maintenance of the technology along with the
technology transfer in the software field will
take the internal ideas international.
ANTRIX
The
activity in the international field after the
ANTRIX has been increased. The national
counterpart for the progress in the country need
to be initiated.
RESPOND
The
respond project need to be spread more into the
higher research areas and the universities must be
encouraged to handle more contribution into the
application field as being done in many of the
foreign countries. The design and building of the
satellite could be the role of ISRO but inputs
could even come from the universities. The
education and the strength of universities towards
this need to be developed. This could be done only
when ISRO spreads its people and activity in tight
collaboration with education sector.
Software
Development in application area
Software
development is needed for the applications. But in
most of the applications areas the in-house
software itself is not being used. The overall
outcome is that the so-called software being
developed in the application areas of space
technology are not really being utilized. The
developers are becoming experts in the
applications with out really contributing.
The
satellite data and the formats, resolution,
application areas and the technology is changing
by year after year and the scientists are go on
experimenting with the international technologies.
The standard of research is also not very high to
get international publications (this could be
surveyed and established if required).
R&D
Vs. Production
Inside
the department the discrimination is seen clearly
when some one is not in the so-called-R&D.
This is due to the fact that the applications are
not seen as the mainstream activity of ISRO/DOS.
It is high time to see that the close interaction
with the user agencies the production could be
taken up inside the department with some budgetary
tie-up with the user agencies.
Moon
Mission
The
idea of proving the capabilities is good.
It is also a welcome objective to see the
Indian flag on moon. However, greater clarity
regarding the studies to be taken-up at moon is
critical to judging the value of this mission.
Role
of Technologists
The
telecommunication has the super strive in these
years. But the fact is that the technologists of
ISRO/DOS have not seen this opportunity. This is
due to the fact that the intra-department
interactions are lacking. It is required to see
that the role of the technologists are given due
share when the backbone is from the space
technology.
The
space department is happy when its satellite is
put onto the orbit – regardless of whether the
satellite is the communication or the remote
sensing device. The communication satellite
projects in its application demands and the direct
involvement will bring in new requirements and
understanding them will create window for the
development of newer technologies for tomorrow.
In
the data utilization awareness and marketing in
the remote sensing front the Indian space have
failed. The launch costs are 1000 times higher
than the application handling. The common public
has not still have a handle on the satellite data.
It needs to be spread at least to the level of
university students, for which free data for the
students project etc. could be tried out. Today,
to get satellite data for students to study is not
very easy. The software for the processing and
application project handling is not available to
the common student community.
It
is felt that the applications are to be dealt by
the user agencies independently. This being the
view of the space technologists, the money
ear-marked for the application front is much less.
The utilization of the data becomes the discretion
of the user. Thus he goes for the purchase of the
data available across the globe, even with higher
cost. Thus the Indian data gets non-utilized. This
is the situation in the remote sensing
applications.
State
of Art RS Data Sources
In
the following table the state-of-the-art remote
sensing satellite imagery details are listed (Ref
: http://www.infoterra-global.com/satellite.htm ).
Optical
Satellites
|
Satellite
|
Ground
Resolution
|
Spectral
Bands
|
Swath
Width
|
Repeat
Cycle
|
Archive
|
|
SPOT
|
10m
panchromatic
20m multi-spectral
|
1
panchromatic
3 multi-spectral
|
60
km
|
26
days
|
Since
1986
|
|
LANDSAT
MSS
|
80m
multi-spectral scanner
|
4
multi-spectral
|
185
km
|
16
days
|
Since
1973
|
|
LANDSAT
TM
|
30m
thematic mapper
|
7
multi-spectral
|
185
km
|
16
days
|
Since
1984
|
|
LANDSAT
ETM
|
30m
thematic mapper
15m panchromatic
|
7
multi-spectral
1 panchromatic
|
185
km
|
16
days
|
Since
1999
|
|
EROS
|
1.8m
panchromatic
|
1
panchromatic
|
12.5
x 12.5 km
|
Variable
|
In
process
|
|
IRS
P
|
5.8m
|
1
panchromatic
|
23
- 70.5 km
|
24
days
|
Since
1996
|
|
IRS
LISS-3
|
23.5m
|
4
multi-spectral
|
70
- 41 km
|
24
days
|
Since
1996
|
|
IRS
WiFS
|
188m
|
2
multi-spectral
|
774
km
|
5
days
|
Since
1996
|
|
IKONOS
|
1m
panchromatic
4m multi-spectral
|
1
panchromatic
4 multi-spectral
|
Not
applicable
|
Variable
|
Since
1999
|
Radar
Satellites
|
Satellite
|
Resolution
|
Incidence
Angle
|
Swath
Width
|
Repeat
Cycle
|
Archive
|
|
RADARSAT
|
8-100m
|
1
panchromatic
3 multi-spectral
|
60
km
|
26
days
|
Since
1986
|
|
ERS
|
30m
thematic mapper
80m multi-spectral
scanner
|
7
thematic mapper
4 multi-spectral
scanner
|
185
km
|
16
days
|
Since
1973
|
|
JERS
|
1.6m
panchromatic
|
1
panchromatic
|
12.5
x 12.5 km
|
Variable
|
In
process
|
Indian
Remote Sensing Data Provision
Many
private companies abroad are now into the
satellite data services sector. Space Imaging is
one such leading agency in US.
Infoterra's Satellite Data Services is
Europe's leading independent provider of satellite
imagery. In India it is NRSA under the Department
of Space who is responsible for the data
distribution and support.
IRS-1D
is the latest in the series of Indian commercial
Remote Sensing high-resolution satellites. IRS-1D
was launched on the 29th September 1997, and
carries an identical payload to the IRS-1C
satellite, launched on the 28th December 1995.
Both satellites carry three sensors viz. Linear
Imaging Self-scanning Sensor (LISS III);
Panchromatic (PAN) and Wide Field Sensor (WiFS).
The IRS satellites orbit at an altitude of 817Km.
IRS PAN scene sizes are typically 70Km by 70Km
(vertical viewing) and LISS scenes are 140Km by
140Km. PAN sub-scenes (23Km by 23Km) are also
available. IRS PAN data is acquired over the
visible green to near infrared portion of the
spectrum, and has 5.8-meter spatial resolution.
Until the IRS-1C PAN with 5.8-meter spatial
resolution, with 64 gray levels; were commercially
available SPOT PLA data with 10 meter, which has
256 gray levels; was the best.
International
Vs. Indian (RS Applications as an example)
Selecting
the most suitable data type for a particular
application can be a daunting task for the novice,
and occasionally for those who are more
experienced in this subject. The Satellite Data
Services team are able to advise you on the
various imagery available, perform searches to
check on data availability, guide you through the
various options during the ordering process, use
their close links with the data suppliers to
ensure orders are expedited efficiently and
quality check the data before supply. The various
sources of satellite data sets are today from
Landsat, SPOT, ASTER, IRS, EROS, IKONOS, Quickbird,
Radarsat, ENVISAT, and ERS etc. The criteria for
the selection of the satellite data are generally
based on the Coverage, Vintage, Resolutions
and Band Combinations. The spatial and spectral
resolutions of various satellites are pictorially
shown below. The applications of the images are
highly dependent on these factors.
Ref:
http://www.infoterra-global.com/satellite.htm
Remarks
on data Usage
The
selection of the datasets will depend on the
budget apart from the other technical parametric
specifications of the satellite data. The chart
below gives a depiction of choices of the data
sets internationally available against the given
applications described earlier.
|
|
|
|
Excellent
|
|
Useful
in certain conditions
|
|
|
Useful
|
|
Not
normally useful
|
|
|
|
|
Landsat5
TM
|
Landsat
MSS
|
Landsat
ETM+
|
ERS
SAR
|
RADARSAT
SAR
|
ERS
ATSR
|
JERS-1
SAR
|
IRS
Pan
|
IRS
MS
|
NOAA/
AVHRR
|
Hi-Res:
QuickBird
Ikonos
|
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forestry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geology
& Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartography
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk
management
|
|
|
|