|
National
Security Initiatives at the Department of Atomic
Energy
Sunil
S
Introduction
We talk
about many problems like disarmament, and
sometimes one has the feeling that although there
is apparent agreement, really behind it there is
not that faith in disarmament that is necessary,
and that talks are more of some kind of attempt to
put the other party in the wrong rather than to
achieve something, while it is of the utmost
importance that achievement should take place.
-
Prime
Minister Jawaharlal Nehru [[i]]
India
is the world’s largest secular democracy. The
preservation of its social, political, and
economic well-being constitutes the primary focus
of efforts of the Government of India. To secure
their well-being, Indians must be able seek
resources and generate wealth on a global scale to
meet their needs. A global environment that is
dominated by nuclear powers vying for control of
critical resources is not conducive to producing
the peace and stability essential to India’s
growth as a nation. It stands to reason that
verifiable, non-discriminatory, global nuclear
disarmament is a natural goal of India’s policy.
This
was the dominant theme in Indian government
thinking and utterances on nuclear security issues
[[ii]].
International
initiatives over the past fifty years have failed to end
the global nuclear double standard [[iii]].
Not only is global nuclear disarmament a distant
dream, the effects of rampant nuclear
proliferation activities in past three decades are
simply alarming [[iv]].
Such factors create a difficult environment for
making an overt political choice on the issue of
nuclear weapons.
The complicated nature of these choices was
the driving force behind India’s strident
utterances on global nuclear disarmament [[v],[vi]].
Against
this backdrop the need to maintain a degree of
autonomy in decision-making on matters of nuclear
security becomes paramount. A
core of scientific and technological expertise is
necessary to preserve this autonomy. Herein lays
the ambit of the national security initiatives at
the Department of Atomic Energy.
Through a regime of tireless indigenous
effort, the Department of Atomic Energy seeks to
inculcate the spirit of scientific and
technological endeavor. Only such a spirit will
empower the minds and arms of India’s future
generations [[vii]].
In the words of Dr. R. Narasimha [[viii]],
The
various names
that
have
been
coined
by
Western
analysts
at
various
times
to
describe
India’s policies of the time are, in this
view, no more than temporary labels for a central
policy that has always been the same; namely
one of
seeking,
preserving
and
protecting
the country’s strategic space and
autonomy at
the lowest possible cost.
The
belief in the goal of global nuclear disarmament
reflects the national consensus on nuclear issues
in India. This consensus is not easily beguiled by
vague promises of nuclear armed states nor does it
live in ignorance or indifference to the security
realities of our time.
Research
and Development
"India
must become strong. The greatest advantage of
recognized strength is that you don't have to use
it."
- R. Chidambaram [[ix]]
As
alluded to earlier in the piece, the difficult
decision to seek an indigenous nuclear option
falls outside the realm of responsibility of the
Department of Atomic Energy. The Department may
contribute to the process of choice through
technical consultations, but the final decision in
these matters has always been that of the Prime
Minister of India [[x]].
The Department of Atomic Energy for its part
fosters a range of activities capable of
supporting a wide menu of choices in this regard.
Throughout the history of independent India, Prime
Ministers have devoted considerable amounts of
time to making choices in this regard and on two
occasions Prime Ministers have chosen an overt
display of India’s nuclear prowess. In both
these cases the Government of India chose to
openly test the products of research activity at
Department of Atomic Energy institutions.
On
May 18th 1974 Prime Minister Indira
Gandhi instructed the Department of Atomic Energy
to conduct a Peaceful Nuclear Explosion (PNE) at
Pokhran [[xi]].
Scientists at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), the
flagship of the Department of Atomic Energy,
collaborated with a team from the Defence Research
and Development Organization (DRDO) and carried
out a single test at the Khetolai Testing Range in
Pokhran. BARC teams were also responsible for
measuring the yield of the device. The yield
measured at 12 Kilotons [[xii]].
On May 11th 1998 Prime Minister Atal
Bihari Vajpayee instructed the Department of Atomic Energy to
conduct a series of nuclear tests at Pokhran to
validate a number of designs currently under
research at its facilities [[xiii]].
The rationale behind these tests was to achieve a
posture of Credible Minimum Deterrence against
nuclear threat or aggression [[xiv]].
BARC and DRDO teams once again assembled the
devices and instrumentation necessary for the
tests. The tests were highly successful. A summary
of the devices tested is given below [[xv],[xvi]]
|
Test
Number
|
Type
of Device
|
Date
|
Time
|
Yield
|
|
1
|
Thermonuclear
|
11th
May 1998
|
15.45
|
45kT
|
|
2
|
Fission
|
11th
May 1998
|
15.45
|
15kT
|
|
3
|
Low
Yield Experiment
|
11th
May 1998
|
15.45
|
0.2kT
|
|
4
|
Sub
Kiloton
|
13th
May 1998
|
12.21
|
0.5kT
|
|
5
|
Sub
Kiloton
|
13th
May 1998
|
12.21
|
0.3kT
|
The
yields were established through seismic
measurement [[xvii]]
and through the radiochemical analysis [[xviii]].
A yield estimate from crater phenomenology is also
available in the public domain [[xix]].
The successful test of the 45 kT thermonuclear
device has opened the door to higher yields. In
the words of Dr. Anil Kakodkar, Chairman
Department of Atomic Energy [[xx]],
“So
far as thermo-nuclear technology is concerned,
there is no doubt that we have the full range
of capabilities.”
Nuclear
Safety and Security
The
Department of Atomic Energy is also responsible
for matters pertaining to the safety and security
of nuclear installations and nuclear materials.
The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board maintains
surveillance over nuclear installations in the
country and provides periodic reports about
technical and procedural changes needed to enhance
safety at these installations. These reports and
recommendations are made directly to the Atomic
Energy Commission, the nodal body for all
Department of Atomic Energy activity [[xxi]].
The Board of Radiation and Isotope Technology
(BRIT), a subsidiary of the Department of Atomic
Energy is also the sole supplier of radio-isotopes
in India and it maintains a list of people
purchasing radioactive materials in the country [[xxii]].
The Department is also responsible for the
disposal of radioactive wastes and maintains a
number of waste disposal facilities and
immobilization sites [[xxiii],[xxiv]].
Research units at the BARC facility like
the Radiation Safety Systems Division are
responsible for producing radiation monitoring
devices. Other units like Health Physics and
Advisory Division are responsible for radiation
monitoring activities. The Atomic Minerals
Directorate [[xxv]]
of the Department of Atomic Energy is responsible
for controlling exploration and mining of
radioactive minerals in India. The directorate
also has technology development resources and a
wide range of radiological surveillance assets at
its disposal [[xxvi]].
The
Department of Atomic Energy is the nodal body
for all radiological emergencies in India. The DAE
has hosted several national and international
seminars and training schools on dealing with
radiological emergencies. Over the past two
decades the Department of Atomic Energy has
developed an Emergency Response System (ERS) to
deal with on-site and off-site radiological
emergencies. All DAE sites have emergency
management plans and procedures. These plans and
procedures are periodically tested. The core of
the ERS is the Crisis Management Group. The group
functions with the assistance of two Emergency
Control Rooms and coordinates with the National
Crisis Management Committee and the local crisis
response team [[xxvii]].
Currently a plan to build a dedicated
Nuclear-Biological-Chemical (NBC) disaster
response team at the national level is gaining
ground. The Central Industrial Security Force has
been identified as the nodal body for this effort
[[xxviii]].
Given its long standing relationship with nuclear
materials security and safety, it is natural to
assume that the DAE will play a major role in
shaping this new force.
Partners
in Defense
The
Department of Atomic Energy is an active member of
the defense research and development community. In
addition to working with DRDO in the testing of
nuclear devices, the Department of Atomic Energy
also participates in the development of products
necessary for various national security agencies.
Most of the Department’s contribution however is
limited to research type activity, the bulk of the
operational development work falls to the end
user.
A
brief glance at the Department of Atomic Energy
websites shows the following:
Light
Combat Aircraft Project:
A DAE sub-unit participated in the development of
the Multi-Mode Radar platform for the Light Combat
Aircraft project [[xxix]].
Another
sub-unit of the DAE was involved in the
development of heat shrinkable shape memory alloy
tubes for the project [[xxx]].
Navigation
Systems:
A DAE subsidiary was involved in the development
of a fiber optic gyroscope system for use in land
vehicles [[xxxi]].
Defense
Industrial Systems:
A number of DAE groups have participated in the
building custom machines for defense industrial
applications [[xxxii]].
Measurement
Systems:
A group at BARC was involved in developing a laser
based projectile measurement system for a DRDO
laboratory [[xxxiii]].
Some
public domain information sources also suggest
that the Department of Atomic Energy may be
working the following projects:
Advanced
Technology Vessel:
This
project is the name allegedly given to a
collaborative effort between the Indian Navy and
the Department of Atomic Energy. The objective of
this effort is to produce technology for use in a
nuclear powered submarine [[xxxiv]].
Neither the Department of Atomic Energy, nor the
Ministry of Defense has offered any comments on
this issue.
High
Power Microwave Systems:
A group at BARC has built an injection source for
an electron accelerator [[xxxv]].
This development has created much excitement in
the press and rumors abound that the Kilo Ampere
Linear Injector (KALI) could someday be used in a
High Power Microwave gun [[xxxvi]].
The accuracy of these reports is unknown.
International
Treaties and Agreements
India
is a party to several international multilateral
and bilateral agreements on nuclear issues. Some
of the more important ones are:
The
International Atomic Energy Agency Statute [[xxxvii]]:
The International Atomic Energy Agency was setup
in 1957 to monitor and manage the spread of
nuclear technology across the world. India was a
signatory to the IAEA Statute at the UN General
Assembly. The DAE routinely deputes personnel to
the IAEA for various projects. India has signed a
number of protocols and treaties with the IAEA and
IAEA member states, particularly a number of IAEA
safeguards are in place for bilateral nuclear
transfers to India [[xxxviii]].
The DAE is also part of a Regional Cooperation
Agreement with the IAEA and provides nuclear
safety assistance to several countries [[xxxix]].
The Partial Test Ban Treaty (PTBT) [[xl]]
prohibits the use atmospheric, underwater, or
space based testing of nuclear explosives. India
has signed this treaty. The DAE is the nodal body
for all interactions with the IAEA.
Nuclear
Agreements and Confidence Building Measures:
The Draft Nuclear Doctrine [[xli]]
states:
“In
view of the very high destructive potential of
nuclear weapons, appropriate nuclear risk
reduction and confidence building measures shall
be sought, negotiated and instituted."
This
is a persistent theme in Indian thinking on
nuclear issues. As a result of this, there are a
number of nuclear security agreements and
confidence building measures in place between
India and Pakistan. The measures enhance crisis
stability and provide a degree of transparency in
the nuclear arena. A very important agreement
between India and Pakistan is the Bilateral
Agreement on Prohibition of Attack against Nuclear
Installations and Facilities [[xlii]]
which was signed in 1988. Per this agreement India
and Pakistan exchange a list of nuclear facilities
each year. This practice has continued even in period adverse
relations between the two countries. Another issue
was raised in the Lahore Declaration and the
Memorandum of Understanding signed in 1999. This
declaration pertained to measures that would be
put in place to reduce the possibility of an
accidental or unauthorized use of nuclear weapons.
The declaration also calls for the introduction of
communication channels that would reduce the
possibility of misinterpretation of incidents at
places on the nuclear facilities list [[xliii]].
Currently another round of discussions is underway
on more nuclear related confidence building
measures [[xliv]].
In all these discussions, the DAE representatives
provide technical advice and consultation.
Conclusion
Over
the last fifty years the Department of Atomic
Energy has strived to build a capacity to meet
India’s demands in the field of nuclear science.
The corps of professionals generated by this
effort today fleshes out India’s nuclear muscle.
Despite international pressure and technology
denial regimes, the output of DAE institutions
supports a wide range of security postures and has
made the country self-reliant in most areas of
nuclear technology. The Department of Atomic
Energy remains committed to this approach in the
foreseeable future.
To
quote a retired officer of the Govt. of India [[xliv]]:
In
the ages to come our children will grow up in an
India that is very different from
we have grown up in; a safer and stronger
India, and a good measure of such a fair future we
shall owe to the unnamed men and women of the
Department of Atomic Energy.
References
[x]
Raj Chengappa, Weapons of Peace, Harper
Collins, New Delhi 2000
[xii]
R. Chidambaram and R. Ramanna, "Some
Studies on India's Peaceful Nuclear Explosion
Experiment," Peaceful Nuclear Explosions
IV (Vienna: International Atomic Energy
Agency, 1975).
[xviii]
S.B.Manohar, B.S.Tomar, S.S.Rattan, V.K.Shukla,
V.V.Kulkarni and Anil Kakodkar. 1999.
"Post Shot Radioactivity Measurements On
Samples Extracted From Thermonuclear Test
Site", BARC News Letter No. 186,
July 1999.
[xlv]
Personal correspondence, name withheld at
request.
|