BHARAT RAKSHAK MONITOR - Volume 6(3) November December 2003

 

The Crossroads - The North Eastern States

H. Calvin

Introduction

The North Eastern States of India (Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Tripura) are a critical part of the future growth, development and strategic positioning of India.  These states form a gateway from India into Asia, bordering Bhutan, Tibet, China, Bangladesh, and Myanmar.  However, because of poor communication and transportation links between the northeastern states and central India, these states have not been accorded their strategic and economic due.  These states currently experience high levels of illegal immigration and associated demographic change, which coupled with levels of insurgency, could reduce the region into a militarized mountainous morass.  Alternatively, by making the appropriate choices, it is possible to transform the region into an economic engine.  There are three primary drivers in the northeastern states – (a) isolation; (b) demographic change; and (c) armed insurgency.

Isolation

The challenge of isolation is historically due to both the physical terrain as well as the accident of partition.  The 255,000 square kilometers of the northeastern, states are landlocked and are connected to central India through the 22-km corridor through Siliguri, known as the “chicken neck” (1).  Prior to partition, the Northeastern states were an overnight train to Calcutta.  Today, that same overnight ride takes almost three days for the residents of Tripura (2).  The physical isolation can be further understood when it is recognized that six of the seven state capitals are still not connected by rail (2).  Three of the largest cities (Itanagar, Kohima, and Shillong) do not have modern airport facilities (2).  This isolation affects the economic prospects for the region (by affecting the costs of imports and exports) as well as the responsiveness of the rest of India to catastrophes in the region.

Demographic Changes

The region has historically been characterized by a preponderance of peoples classified as “Scheduled Tribes”.  As compared to a national average of 23% scheduled tribes, the proportion of scheduled tribes ranges from 29% in Manipur to 93% in Mizoram (6).  Despite the high proportion of tribal peoples, the literacy rates are higher than the rest of India (4).  The northeastern states have experienced a greater rate of population growth compared to the rest of India (3, 4).  A detailed analysis of the population growth indicates that much of the increased growth rate is related to migration into the northeastern states.  This migration is primarily illegal, and from Bangladesh being cross-referenced by data from Bangladesh (3, 5).  Since Bangladeshi illegals are primarily Muslim, there are now at least three areas, in just Assam that are reported to be majority-majority areas (Dhubri – 70.5%, Barpeta – 56%, Golpara 50%) because of this infiltration of illegals (3).  This has, in turn, aided political and criminal enterprises that wish to take advantage of the tense communal situation.  Interestingly, Assam (19%) and Tripura (16%) of the states that actually border Bangladesh had the lowest decadal growth rates in the North East (4).

Armed insurgency

The northeastern states are the victims of armed insurgencies that, other than the Naga movement, are probably directly related to the perceived neglect of the Central Government and to the financial mismanagement of what little Central funds were allocated (2).  The Interservices Intelligence (ISI) of Pakistan has also taken advantage of the discontent in the northeastern states, further aggravating the situation (7, 8).  As a result, while the insurgency may have had its roots in the lack of development, today, it is believed that it is the insurgencies that prevent development (8). 

Critical Imperatives

Addressing the above referenced factors in a coherent and consistent fashion requires addressing the root causes.  To that extent, it is essential to (a) enhancing transportation and communication infrastructure; (b) wealth creation through industrial development and tourism and (c) manage immigration.  Clearly, none of these prescriptions are easy to implement, or they would already have been implemented.  However, there are relatively low-risk sub-goals that can set the stage to effectively accomplish the four major goals listed above.

Transportation and Communication

The northeast has a critical mass of literate and highly educated people faced with no opportunity for wealth creation.  The constraints in this regard pertain to the ease of electronic communication and electricity reliability in the region, coupled with the sheer costs of transporting goods into and out of the region. 

The costs of transportation are related to both the condition of the road and rail network, its spread, as well as the distance required to be traversed to reach a port (Calcutta). 

Under the current plans, the proposed NS-EW highway project under the National Highway Authority of India will link the northeast from Silchar-Guwahati to Purnea (9, 10, 11).  In addition, there is the Asian Highway Project.  Under this project, the northeast will be linked to the rest of India through Dhaka, along the Dawki-Dispur-Nagaon-Dimapur-Kohima-Imphal-Moreh route (11).  The Asian Highway provides a link between the northeast and the South East Asian states.  However, both of these plans will essentially leave Tripura, Mizoram, and Arunachal Pradesh out of the picture. 

This makes it imperative to create an intra northeastern road network that links to the main arteries of the NSEW and AH.  The costs of road construction in this region may be estimated at between $0.6 – 1.0 million/mile constructed (9, 10). 

 

Figure 1.  NS-EW Map showing links between the northeast to central India.  http://www.nhai.org/nsewmap.htm

It appears that in the long term it is essential to have two NS and two EW corridors within the northeast itself.  These EW corridors should probably be Dong-Tinsukia-Jorhat-Guwahati (300 miles) with a Dibrugarh-Itanagar (200 miles) spur.  The NS corridors should likely be Agartala-Silchar-Shillong-Dispur (200 miles) and Aizawl-Silchar-Imphal-Kohima-Dibrugarh (400 mi).  This would create ~1,000 miles of roads and will probably cost about $1 billion.  Not only will this greatly interlink the NE with itself, but also with the rest of Asia.  In addition, this road network will provide the mobility necessary for a strategic deterrent to be located in the northeast. 

The railways in the northeast are operated under the aegis of the Northeastern Frontier Railways.  These railways have the dubious distinction of having the greatest number of accidents in the Indian Railways system (13).  Currently, there is an embarrassing total of 60 km of railway in the entire northeastern states (outside of Assam) (4).  The Shukla Commission Report pointed out that high costs of construction, operation and maintenance, especially across the Lumding-Badarpur hill section linking the Brahmaputra and Barak Valleys, and few bridges across the mighty Brahmaputra were the critical constraints.  The two key objectives in the northeast include conversion of the railways to broad gauge, and the linking of the major commercial centers.  The cost of railway construction has been estimated at approximately Rs. 2 crore/km (14)  or approximately $0.5 million/mile, slightly lower than the estimates for road construction above.  In addition, is the proposed Trans Asian Railway also proposes to have two E-W passages through the northeast to Myanmar (12).  

Figure 2. Map of Road network in the northeast.  Not to scale

http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/h3i09.htm  

The combined cost of this construction may then be estimated at $2 billion to develop a robust road and rail network in the northeast.  Spread out over a period of 5 years, this is only around $400 million per year.  The primary constraint appears to be related to national will more than economic constraints.

                                                      

 Figure 3. Schematic of the proposed Trans Asian Railway

http://www.unescap.org/tctd/tar/SCorridorMap.htm

In addition to the road and rail links within the northeast, it is imperative to make progress of routes through Bangladesh and Myanmar.  The imperatives of a route through Bangladesh are that it greatly reduces the transportation time, and consequently costs of import and export.  Additionally the route from Agartala-Comilla-Chittagong offers a shorter route to the sea.  Given the recalcitrance of Bangladeshi politicians to evaluate transit through Bangladesh, it is essential to make progress of transportation links through Myanmar.  Most of important of this is a route to the sea, through Akyab/Sittwe (15 - 16).  Additionally, the option of creating a sealink for the northeastern states through Chittagong may be a low-risk military option in a future conflict with Bangladesh.  Given the narrow strip of land separating the Chittagong province from the rest of Bangladesh, and the continuing ethnic suppression of non-Muslims in the region, this is an option that the Indian government must plan for and never foreclose.  

Given the educational level of the northeasterners, the fastest route to economic growth may be through the information services sector of the industry.  Unlike the manufacturing sector, wealth creation through the information sector does not require large infrastructure links, merely communication and air-transportation links.  To this extent, enhancing the air transportation links with the rest of the country is critical.  The example of the Nedumbassery Airport in Kochi, constructed with private funds is one that may be evaluated for a fast-track development of the air-transportation sector in the northeast.  Additionally, evaluating an “open-skies” policy for the northeast enabling private operators to provide air-taxi services would further enable the enhancement of this segment.

Industrial Development

As the Central Government embraces the free market, and as the WTO comes into effect, the opportunities for economic development pass into the hands of individuals and private industry.  Given the historical record of corruption and mismanagement of central funds, perhaps this process must be accelerated.  The existing industrial base revolves around oil and gas production, and the production of tea, wood, and food products.  Unfortunately, there is not much forward integration resulting in much of the value added being lost from the economy of the state.  

There are still some areas where Central direction is essential.  The northeastern regions are known to be rich in oil and gas as well as hydroelectric power generation potential.  The hydroelectric power potential is estimated at around 65,000 MW, or approximately 30% of the national requirements (6, 17).  A series of dams have been proposed on the Siang, Subansiri, Ranganadi, and other rivers.  Predictably, environmentalists are outraged regarding biodiversity issues (17).  It is, however, essential to evaluate the positive impact on the economic well being of the people in the region.  The oil and gas industry is one of long standing in the region.  Recent studies suggest that the Assam-Arrakan basin may hold significant oil and gas reserves (18, 19).  Currently, most of the oil and gas is being transported out of the northeast.  The creation of a refinery and petrochemical sector in the northeast can have a dramatic impact on the manufacturing sector in that region.  For example, much of the plastics business is centered on polypropylene and polyethylene, which can be synthesized from naphtha or gas oils.  By producing the polyolefins at source, the northeast can dramatically enhance their competitiveness in the injection-molded plastics industry in its immediate neighborhood – China, Myanmar, Bhutan, and Bangladesh.

Special Economic Zones

There is much discussion among the northeastern states about the creation of special economic zones (20, 21).  Rather than creating special economic zones within individual states, it might be considered to declare the entire northeastern region and Sikkim a special economic zone.  As part of this, all tariffs on interstate commerce might be lifted, to enable manpower and merchandise to flow to the regions that can most optimally utilize them. 

Tourism

The northeastern states provide the opportunity to go camping, engage in water sports, white water rafting, hiking through valleys, forests, and mountains, rock climbing as well as to view some of the most awesome natural sights in the world.  The northeast is known for its unpolluted air, its majestic tea gardens, its forests, and its monasteries.  It offers unparalleled opportunities to attract both Indian as well as international tourists.  The keys to this are the air-transportation links as well as telephone and Internet communications links with the rest of the world.  The plan to create an eco-tourism circuit, with an investment of approximately $15 million, in the northeast including investments in signage, and water sports (Shillong to Kohima via Guwahati, Kaziranga, Tezpur, Bhalukpong, Tawang, Majuli and Sivsagar) is certainly a step in the right direction (23).

Manage Immigration

The continuing illegal immigration of Bangladeshi nationals into India may be expected to accelerate unless proactive steps are taken to mitigate it.  Since India is growing faster than Bangladesh economically, and Bangladesh is growing faster than India demographically, it can be concluded that the per capita income differential will expand.  As it expands, the driving force for illegal immigration will increase, rather than decrease.  Given the political drivers within Bangladesh, it is unlikely that the Bangladeshi government will (a) admit that ex-migration is occurring; or (b) implement steps to reduce it.  Consequently, it is essential that the Government of India adopt the steps that can at least mitigate this.  Some of the recommendations include (1) (a) fencing; (b) increased BSF policing; and (c) creation of an identification card registry.  These steps only require will at the national level to be accomplished.

Summary

The northeastern states were probably the greatest affected by partition.  Partition robbed them of their links with central India, while simultaneously linking them tenuously.  The loss of road and rail links as well as easy access to the sea meant that industry and the economy of the northeast suffered.  The semi-command economy also meant that central assistance was likely apportioned on a political basis.  The combination of limited funding and mismanagement of these funds ensured that the northeast remained underdeveloped.  Much of the insurgent challenges appear to be under control although there are a number of armed extralegal groups that are still active, including in Nagaland. 

Addressing the root causes of these errors requires a commitment to creating infrastructure links with the northeast in terms of road and rail corridors, as well as transit links through Bangladesh and opening sea access either through Chittagong or Akyab.  Once these infrastructure requirements are created, it becomes easier to create a manufacturing or information services industry in the region.  The key sources of wealth creation pertain to electricity generation (through hydel projects), oil and gas production, processing and chemical manufacturing, Internet services, and tourism.  Simultaneously, it is essential to address the influx of illegal migrants from Bangladesh.  There are a number of steps that the Central government can implement unilaterally, and which are essential in this regard.  Creating a special economic zone across the northeastern states can provide a major stimulus to trade with Bhutan, Bangladesh, Burma, Nepal, and China.  With some sustained commitment from the Central government, along with measures designed to unleash the entrepreneurial skill of the northeasterners, the region could become the gateway to South East Asia.

References

  1. Krishnan, K., “ Policing the Indo-Bangladeshi Border” Strategic Analysis 25 (5) (August 2001) pp 663-673 http://www.idsa-india.org/an-aug-2.01.htm

  2. Gokhale, N., “The Neglected States of the Nation” Outlook (May 22, 2003).  http://www.northeastvigil.com/articles/detail.php?id=73

  3. Kotwal, D., “Insurgency in Assam: The Demographic Dimensions” Strategic Analysis 25 (2) (May 2001) pp 313-324.  http://www.idsa-india.org/an-may11.01.htm

  4. http://www.northeastvigil.com/facts/nedemo/nedemo.htm

  5. “Bangladesh’s Poor – India’s Woe” North-East Sun (July 1-14, 2000) pp 16-17.

  6. Sarma, A., “Economic Development of the Northeastern States in the Context of Globalization” Strategic Analysis 25 (2) (May 2001) pp 295 - 312.  http://www.idsa-india.org/an-may10.01.htm

  7. Vasudeva, P. K., “Insurgency in the North-east” Indian Strategic Review (April 10, 2001).  http://members.tripod.com/israindia/isr/week1/neindia.html

  8. Masih, M. “The Impact of Insurgency on the North-East” Manipur Online (October 11, 2002).  http://www.manipuronline.com/Opinions/October2002/impactofinsurgency11_1.htm

  9. http://www.nhai.org/nsewmap.htm

  10. http://www.mapsofindia.com/maps/india/h3i09.htm

  11. http://www.unescap.org/tctd/ah/routemap.htm

  12. http://www.unescap.org/tctd/tar/SCorridorMap.htm

  13. http://pib.nic.in/archieve/lreleng/lyr2001/rapr2001/19042001/r1904200128.html

  14. Thapliyal, S. “India-Bangladesh Transportation Links: A Move for Closer Cooperation” Strategic Affairs 22 (12) (March 1999) pp 1921-1931.  http://www.idsa-india.org/an-mar9-8.html

  15. Das, A. “A framework for free trade” Bharat Rakshak Monitor 5 (4) (January-February 2003) http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE5-4/das.html

  16. Bahroo, L. “Intersecting Destinies of a New Asia” Bharat Rakshak Monitor 5 (6) (May June 2003) http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE5-6/bahroo.html

  17. Goswami, R., “How green was the valley”, The Telegraph (March 22, 2003) http://www.northeastvigil.com/articles/detail.php?id=66

  18. “Oil and Gas Production set to increase manifold” The Hindu (Jan 12, 2003) http://www.thehindu.com/thehindu/2003/01/12/stories/2003011202391100.htm

  19. http://www.ongcindia.com/ongcnews1.asp?fold=ongcnews&file=ongcnews34.txt

  20. DONER for declaration of NE as Special Economic Zone (May 31, 2001) http://www.northeasttribune.fcpages.com/481.htm

  21. Irom, C., “A United Approach for the North East” Manipur Online (November 15, 2002).  http://www.manipuronline.com/Opinions/November2002/unitedapproach15_2.htm

  22. Ratnannavar, M. B. “North East Region emerging as a land of opportunity” Free Press Journal (July 30, 2002) http://www.samachar.com/features/300702-fpj.html

  23. http://assamchronicle.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=395

Acknowledgements 

This article is the result of much discussion on the Bharat Rakshak Forum.  Many thanks are due to Victor, Rye, Anaath Das, Laxman, and others.

 

Copyright © Bharat Rakshak 2004