Rediscovering
Asia
Shri Yashwant Sinha
Minister for External Affairs
Govt. of India
The
foreign policy of any country, I suppose, must aim
at a comprehensive, productive, meaningful and
mutually beneficial relationship with all
countries in the world. No country can afford not
to be engaged with its neighborhood. The concept
of neighborhood has also undergone a change.
Today, it is not the immediate neighborhood alone
but it is the extended neighborhood. The
‘near’ far as some people describe it or the
‘far neighborhood’ as others choose to call
it. Therefore India’s engagement with this
extended neighborhood should not come as a
surprise. In fact as Prakash Nanda has mentioned,
the absence of such an engagement is a matter of
surprise. There is no point in today going into
the history of why that engagement did not
materialize in the decades after independence. As
he has brought out and as you will discover from
this book, when we became an independent country,
that engagement was very much on the cards and all
the writings and speeches of our first Prime
Minister Jawaharlal Nehru dwelt on that
engagement, emphasizing the importance of that
engagement. But somewhere down the line it got
diluted, derailed or for whatever reason, that
engagement did not fructify in the manner in which
it should have.
It
was only in the last decade of the last century
that Prime Minister Narasimha Rao came out with
his Look East policy and after that we have been
engaging countries in East Asia. Prakash Nanda is
quite right in saying that this was interpreted
somewhat narrowly as Indo-ASEAN engagement. We
felt that if we engage the ten countries of ASEAN
that was engagement with East Asia and it is also
true that in some of my recent speeches, I have
said that we have entered Phase-II of our Look
East policy, which is both, more comprehensive in
its coverage territorially and materially. In
terms of territorial expanse, besides the ten
countries in ASEAN, we are engaged with North East
Asia, with Japan, with China and the Koreas. Down
south there is much greater engagement with
Australia and New Zealand. Therefore when we talk
of India-East Asia engagement we are including
this whole region.
It
is important to note that this
is a much deeper and broader engagement. Last
year, our Prime Minister traveled to Phnom Penh
for the first-ever ASEAN-India Summit. He
suggested that we should negotiate a framework
agreement for a Free Trade Area between ASEAN and
India. The suggestion was received with a certain
element of disbelief. There were some doubts with
regard to the speed with which it could be
achieved. Within twelve months, when we met the
ASEAN again at the summit level, this time in
Bali, we signed three documents with ASEAN. We
signed the framework agreement on FTA. We acceded
to the Friendship and Amity Treaty. We signed a
MOU on counter terrorism. Within a short span of
twelve months therefore, engagement with ASEAN has
acquired a deeper meaning. With South Korea, Japan
and China also having their own free trade
agreements with ASEAN, perhaps, we are on the
threshold of a much larger conglomeration of
nations, perhaps, at the threshold of an Asian
free trade area, because if those countries have
free trade with ASEAN, then, we are also engaging
each other in a more extensive context.
I
was recently in Australia and I noticed a certain
eagerness there to engage with India. They are
building a relationship with ASEAN, with Asia and
they very much want India to be a part of this.
Similarly, the Ganga-Mekong Group, the BIMSTC-EC,
and the Indian Ocean Rim countries all emphasize
this deeper engagement of India with the rest of
Asia. I was therefore not surprised when I found
in the book and, to which Prakash Nanda has made a
reference here that in Korea, there is a feeling
that India is not part of Asia. If there was such
a feeling, I think, the Thai initiative of the
Asian Cooperation Dialogue, which started two
years ago, has put to rest any doubts that anyone
had with the concept of Asia, because in the first
meeting of the Asian Cooperation Dialogue which
was held in Thailand and which I attended as
representative of India in my capacity as the then
Finance Minister of India, we had Pakistan and we
had Qatar. Subsequently, the Group expanded from
18 to 22 and this time when we had a brief meeting
of the Foreign Ministers on the margins of the
UNGA in New York, we had Kazakhstan; we had Saudi
Arabia and more countries from east and west of
India. Now, therefore, the point I am making is
that like we have the Look East policy, Thailand
has a Look West policy and they are trying to
engage countries in the Gulf, in the Middle East
and in Central Asia. So, we when in the context of
India, talk of the extended neighborhood, it
certainly is all the countries including Australia
and New Zealand, all the countries of East Asia,
all the countries in Central Asia, all the
countries in the Gulf and West Asia.
If
you look at the geography of this continent, you
will find India is at the heart of it. Not merely
must we be geographically in the center of things,
but in our engagement also, we must be in the
center of things, because India has this advantage
geographically and otherwise, to become the
lynchpin in engagement of various countries.
Therefore, in recent years, India has put emphasis
on, if I could borrow this expression of
‘rediscovering Asia’. We have emphasized on
Central Asia, the countries of Asia to the west of
Pakistan and of course East Asia. I also notice in
interaction with representatives of these regions,
that there is a new consciousness of their Asian
identity. People across countries are freely
talking about the twenty-first century being an
Asian century.
There
are any numbers of reports brought out by research
organizations around the world that Asia will lead
the economic growth of the world in the
twenty-first century. There is this very
interesting analysis which has come out recently
by Goldman Sachs, I think, which talks of how the
big economies are going to perform. That is not
merely Asia, it includes Brazil and Russia also
and there is a reference to South Africa too. How
they are going to be in 2050? The brightest place
goes to China and India in this. Now if China and
India are the engines for the growth of the whole
world economy, then, clearly, Asia will play its
destined role in not only development and economic
growth around the world but also in its security
dimensions. When I was telling you about India
being at the heart of Asia, I also had in my mind
the history of contacts which we have had with all
these regions and the fact that India never went
out with its sword to these countries. We never
went out as conquerors or as colonizers. We went
out with our civilizational values, with our
culture, with our religion and in friendship and
in amity. That is in the historical character of
the Indian nation and I do not think that
historical character can be altered by
contemporary or future events. That historical
character will hold. In other words, India will
approach these nations in friendship and amity,
with peace and prosperity in mind and mutual
benefit. Therefore I notice that we are a little
more than welcome.
Engagement
with India is a little more desirable and all
these countries are today recognizing the strength
of India - the strength in terms of military, the
strength in terms of the growing size of our
economy, strength of achievements in science and
technology, the strength in terms of achievements
of our human resources. We owe it to these
countries that we assist them in the best possible
manner. Therefore, in all our interactions, the
emphasis is on science and technology, the
emphasis is on development of human resources and
the emphasis is on greater economic engagement in
terms of investment as well as in terms of trade.
The emphasis is on whatever technical assistance
India can extend to these countries. Clearly, if
India wants to pursue the national and
international goals that we have set for
ourselves, we would like peace to prevail globally
and particularly, in our region. Any threat to
peace by state actors or non state actors is a
threat to the goal of prosperity for our people
that we pursue. I think there is a consensus
within India that this is a goal which should be
pursued with single-minded determination. It is
for this reason that India seeks peace and it is
for this reason that we are cooperating with all
in the fight against terrorism.
In
the immediate context, greater economic engagement
among the regions of Asia and a determined and
joint fight against terrorism are the challenges
that we face. Except for some exceptions, by and
large, we find this view shared by everyone,
whether they be the countries of Central Asia,
Gulf or West Asia and East Asia. Concern against
terrorist outfits is as much present in Central
Asia as it is present in India. It is as much
present today in East Asia as it is present in
India. It is as much present in the Gulf because
of the events that have happened as it is in
India. It is a shared concern.
This is a threat, which, I have no doubt in my
mind, will be overcome. I think the forces which
have taken to terrorism will be subdued soon
because the fight against terrorism is becoming
global. There are no doubt differences in
perception. These differences in perception are
however vanishing as more and more terrorist
attacks are take place around the world. Double
standards will have to be given up as there is no
way the world will be able to deal with terrorism
through double standards. So, this is something
which is evolving and bound to have its lessons
for the rest of the world.
India
has been very clear about its understanding of
terrorism. We do not see terrorism as a clash of
civilizations. We do not link terrorism with any
religion and it will be a grievous error of
understanding to do that. We are also against
double standards in the fight against terrorism.
If we are to win this war, it will have to be
fought with a single-minded purpose. Clearly, for
this, international obligations enshrined in the
various documents will have to be enforced.
Therefore, if I look into the future, by the end
of this decade or by the next decade, this is a
challenge which would be fully met. Terrorism will
become a thing of the past, perhaps, a sad chapter
in human history.
I think more and more nations throughout the world
want peace because they are all facing a
revolution of rising expectations. Democratic
norms are bound to prevail. More and more
countries which do not have democracy today will
embrace democracy and democracies will generally
opt for peace rather than war. Therefore, we can
look forward to a world and an Asia, which will be
more democratic, which will pursue economic
objectives and which will give a better quality of
life to their people. For that purpose, interest
in peace will be far more abiding and enduring
than is the case at this point of time. All these
have been part of our historical tradition. All
these are avowed objectives of India’s foreign
policy. All these are the national goals of India
and therefore in this context, I see a very clear
role for India in Asia.
I
have no doubt in my mind that the kind of comment
that Prakash Nanda had to hear in the Republic of
Korea will not be heard in future. Countries in
all parts of Asia will realize that India is Asia
and that India will have to play its role in
delivering Asia to its destiny. India will also
play an important role in Asia’s relationship
with the rest of the world. I would like to
congratulate Prakash Nanda once again for this
very interesting book that he has brought out. We
will all benefit by his very substantive ideas and
analysis and as I said, some of the concerns which
have been expressed in the book will be taken care
of by those who are in-charge of framing policies.
Let
me join Shri. Bharat Verma in congratulating Shri.
Prakash Nanda on writing a book, which can only be
described as monumental. I have had occasion to
glance through the book. I think the inclusion of
an interesting historical perspective and
contemporary events along with a description of
the evolution of India’s engagement with Asia
makes this book an extremely valuable contribution
to the literature on this subject.
Thank
you very much
A
speech by Shri. Yashwant Sinha at the launch of
Shri. Prakash Nanda’s book “Rediscovering
Asia: Evolution of India’s Look East Policy”.
The book was organized by Lancer Publishers
at the Indian International Center in New Delhi on
November 5, 2003. The speech has been reproduced
here with the permission of Capt. (r) Bharat Verma,
the editor of India Defence Review.